Merge pull request Wasm-DSL#21 from ajklein/patch-1

Fix a few typos in Explainer.md

proposals/fibers/Explainer.md

@@ -202,19 +202,19 @@ This, in turn, means that a fiber manager may be relieved of the burden of commu
 
 #### `fiber.retire` Retire a fiber
 
-The `fiber.retire` instruction is used when a fiber has finished its work and wishes to inform its parent of any final results. Like `fiber.suspend` (and `fiber.resume`), `fiber.retire` has an event argument—together with associated values on the agument stack— that are communicated.
+The `fiber.retire` instruction is used when a fiber has finished its work and wishes to inform its parent of any final results. Like `fiber.suspend` (and `fiber.resume`), `fiber.retire` has an event argument—together with associated values on the argument stack— that are communicated.
 
 In addition, the retiring fiber is put into a moribund state and any computation resources associated with it are released. If the fiber has any active descendants then they too are made moribund.
 
 >It is not recommended that a fiber allows exceptions to be propagated out of the fiber function. Instead, the function should use a `fiber.retire` —together with an appropriate event description—to signal the exceptional return. This allows the resume ancestor to directly capture the exceptional event as part of its normal response to the resume.
 
->The reason that we don't recommend allowing exceptions to propagate is that an inapprpriate exception handler may be invoked as a result. This is especially dangerous in the case that the retiring fiber was switched to—with a `fiber.switch` instruction—rather than being resumed.
+>The reason that we don't recommend allowing exceptions to propagate is that an inappropriate exception handler may be invoked as a result. This is especially dangerous in the case that the retiring fiber was switched to—with a `fiber.switch` instruction—rather than being resumed.
 
 #### `fiber.retireto` Retire a fiber and directly switch
 
 The `fiber.retireto` instruction is used when a fiber has finished its work and wishes to switch to another fiber. This is analogous to tail recursive calls of functions: the current fiber is retiring and another fiber is resumed.
 
-The `fiber.retireto` instruction has three operands: the identity of the fiber being retired, the identity of the fiber being resumed and an event —together with associated values on the agument stack—to communicate to the newly resumed fiber.
+The `fiber.retireto` instruction has three operands: the identity of the fiber being retired, the identity of the fiber being resumed and an event —together with associated values on the argument stack—to communicate to the newly resumed fiber.
 
 In addition, the retiring fiber is put into a moribund state and any computation resources associated with it are released.
 
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ During normal execution, the `$arrayGenerator` is always waiting for an `$next`
 
 Notice that the array generator has definite knowledge of its own fiber—it is given the identity of its fiber explictly. This is needed because when a fiber suspends, it must use the identity of the fiber that is suspending. There is no implicit searching for which computation to suspend.
 
-The end of the `$arrayGenerator`&mdashwhich is triggered when there are no more elements to generate—is marked by a simple `return`. This will terminate the fiber and also signal to the consumer that generation has finished.
+The end of the `$arrayGenerator`—which is triggered when there are no more elements to generate—is marked by a simple `return`. This will terminate the fiber and also signal to the consumer that generation has finished.
 
 #### Consuming generated elements
 The consumer side of the generator/consumer scenario is similar to the generator; with a few key differences:
@@ -871,4 +871,4 @@ When a `fiber` terminates, the stack resources it uses may be released; however,
 
 An alternative approach could be based on _reusing_ `fiber` references. In particular, if we allow a moribund fiber to be reused then the issue of garbage collecting old `fiber` references becomes a problem for the toolchain to address: it would become responsible for managing the `fiber` references it has access to.
 
-A further restriction would enhance this: if the only place where a `fiber` reference could be stored was in a table, then, if the default value for a `fiber` table entry were a moribund `fiber`, complete reponsibility for managing `fiber` references could be left to the toolchain. 
+A further restriction would enhance this: if the only place where a `fiber` reference could be stored was in a table, then, if the default value for a `fiber` table entry were a moribund `fiber`, complete reponsibility for managing `fiber` references could be left to the toolchain.