Non enterprise test #2

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T11:22:41Z

No description provided.

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:07:34Z

/review

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:12:49Z

Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful
Static Analysis: Partially Successful - Failed to execute static code analysis using fb_infer

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR introduces a new method for printing even numbers from an array in Java. This method, named Even, follows a similar structure to the existing main method but contains a critical logical error in its loop's increment expression. The code is straightforward and follows Java's standard coding conventions. However, the logical error significantly impacts the functionality, and there are opportunities for optimization and improvement in maintainability and performance.
Code change type: Feature Addition
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2. The code is simple and the changes are not extensive, but the logical error requires attention and correction.

The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 1 file and discovered 10 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files

High-level Feedback

General feedback for improvement includes addressing the logical error in the loop's increment expression, considering code reuse for similar functionalities, and adding unit tests to ensure the correctness of both existing and new functionalities.

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:12:51Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Suggestion: Consider abstracting the logic for printing elements of the array into a separate method that accepts the starting index and the increment as parameters. This would reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
Code Suggestion:

+ public static void printArrayElements(int[] arr, int start, int increment) { + for (int i = start; i < arr.length; i += increment) { + System.out.println(arr[i]); + } + } + public static void Even(String[] args) { + int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; + printArrayElements(arr, 1, 2); // For even + }

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:12:51Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Suggestion: Add unit tests to verify the correct functionality of the Even (or renamed) method, especially focusing on edge cases such as empty arrays or arrays with a single element.
Code Suggestion:

+ @Test + public void testPrintEvenNumbers() { + // Implement unit tests + }

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:12:51Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Security Issue: The method Even(String[] args) reuses a Scanner instance for system input without proper input validation, potentially allowing for injection attacks if the input is manipulated or if the method is adapted for use with external input sources in the future.
Fix: Implement input validation checks within the Even method to ensure that only expected types, lengths, formats, and ranges are accepted. This can mitigate risks associated with untrusted input data.
Code Suggestion:

Implement input validation checks within the Even method to ensure that only expected types, lengths, formats, and ranges are accepted. This can mitigate risks associated with untrusted input data.

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:12:51Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Code Structure Issue: The method Even is not following Java naming conventions. Method names should start with a lowercase letter and follow camelCase notation.
Fix: Rename the method from 'Even' to 'even' to adhere to Java naming conventions.
Code Suggestion:

public static void even(String[] args) { Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in); int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; System.out.println("Even numbers:"); for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i += 2) { System.out.println(arr[i]); } }

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:28:55Z

/review

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:33:50Z

Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful
Static Analysis: Partially Successful - Failed to execute static code analysis using fb_infer

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR introduces a method to print even numbers from an array, mirroring the existing method for odd numbers. While the intention is clear and the code is simple, there are several areas for improvement, especially concerning code duplication, efficiency, and potential bugs. The addition does not include unit tests, which is a critical oversight for maintaining code quality.
Code change type: Feature Addition
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2 - The code is straightforward, but the lack of tests and some logical issues require attention to detail.

The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 1 file and discovered 7 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files

High-level Feedback

The PR successfully adds functionality to print even numbers from an array, but it introduces redundancy and has a potential bug in the loop's increment logic. There's a missed opportunity to refactor the existing code to reduce duplication and improve maintainability. Additionally, the absence of unit tests is a significant concern for ensuring the correctness of both existing and new functionalities.

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:33:52Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Suggestion: Refactor the new Even method and the existing odd number printing logic into a single, more flexible method to avoid code duplication. Also, correct the loop's increment logic to ensure it iterates through even indices correctly. Consider adding parameterization to distinguish between odd and even number printing or integrating both functionalities into a single method with a mode selector.
Code Suggestion:

- public static void Even(String[] args) { + public static void printNumbersByType(String[] args, String type) { + Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in); + int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; + if (type.equals("Even")) { + System.out.println("Even numbers:"); + for (int i = 1; i < arr.length; i = i + 2) { + System.out.println(arr[i]); + } + } else if (type.equals("Odd")) { + System.out.println("Odd numbers:"); + for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i + 2) { + System.out.println(arr[i]); + } + } + }

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:33:52Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Security Issue: The method Even(String[] args) duplicates functionality and introduces a potential infinite loop due to the loop condition 'i = i * 2'. This not only affects program stability but can also be exploited in scenarios where the application's resources are limited, leading to a denial-of-service condition.
Fix: Refactor the Even method to correctly iterate through the array without causing an infinite loop. Use a loop increment that ensures the loop will terminate, such as 'i += 2' for even indices. Additionally, consider merging this functionality with the existing method to print odd numbers, to avoid code duplication and reduce the attack surface.
Code Suggestion:

public static void even(String[] args) { // Assuming the array 'arr' is already defined System.out.println("Even numbers:"); for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i += 2) { System.out.println(arr[i]); } }

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T12:33:52Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Code Structure Issue: The method Even is not following Java naming conventions. Method names should start with a lowercase letter and follow camelCase notation.
Fix: Rename the method from Even to even or a more descriptive name following camelCase notation.
Code Suggestion:

public static void even(String[] args) { // method implementation }

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T13:12:28Z

Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful
Static Analysis: Partially Successful - Failed to execute static code analysis using fb_infer

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR introduces a new method to print even numbers from an array in the Java/avg/array.java file. While the intention is clear and the code achieves its basic functionality, there are several areas for improvement. These include code duplication, potential for index out of bounds exceptions, and lack of adherence to Java naming conventions. There's also an opportunity to improve code efficiency and maintainability.
Code change type: Feature Addition
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2 - The changes are straightforward but require attention to detail to ensure quality improvements.

The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 1 file and discovered 6 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files

High-level Feedback

Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability. Introducing unit tests would significantly increase the reliability of the new feature. Adhering to Java naming conventions and considering the efficiency of your loops can also enhance code quality.

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T13:12:32Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Suggestion: Refactor the Even method to use proper Java naming conventions. Method names should start with a lowercase letter. Additionally, consider extracting the logic for printing numbers from an array into a separate method that both Even and the main method can use to reduce code duplication.
Code Suggestion:

- public static void Even(String[] args) { + public static void printEvenNumbers(String[] args) {

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T13:12:32Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Code Structure Issue: The method Even should follow Java naming conventions. Method names should start with a lowercase letter.
Fix: Rename the method from Even to even or any other name that starts with a lowercase letter, ensuring it accurately represents the method's functionality.
Code Suggestion:

public static void even(String[] args)

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T13:50:46Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Suggestion: Refactor the Even method to use proper Java naming conventions. Method names should start with a lowercase letter. Additionally, consider extracting the logic for printing numbers from an array into a separate method that both Even and the main method can use to reduce code duplication.
Code Suggestion:

- public static void Even(String[] args) { + public static void printEvenNumbers(String[] args) {

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T13:50:46Z

Java/avg/array.java

+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)


Suggestion: The loop increment i = i * 2 will cause an IndexOutOfBoundsException for arrays with more than 1 element. Use i += 2 for iterating through even indices, or revise the logic to correctly identify even numbers.
Code Suggestion:

- for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2) + for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i += 2)

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T13:50:46Z

Java/avg/array.java

@@ -12,4 +12,15 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
            System.out.println(arr[i]);
        }
    }
+
+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);


Suggestion: The Scanner instance 'sc' is created but never used, which is unnecessary overhead. Remove this line to clean up the code. Also, since the array 'arr' is identical in both methods, consider defining it as a class-level static variable to avoid duplication.
Code Suggestion:

- Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in); - int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; + // Removed unused Scanner instance and duplicate array definition.

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T13:50:46Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");


Suggestion: The method name and print statement suggest that this method should only print even numbers, but the loop logic does not specifically check if the numbers are even. Ensure the logic matches the method's purpose by checking the number's evenness before printing.
Code Suggestion:

+ System.out.println("Even numbers:"); + for (int i = 1; i < arr.length; i += 2) { + if (arr[i] % 2 == 0) { + System.out.println(arr[i]); + } + }

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T13:50:46Z

Java/avg/array.java

+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)


Security Issue: The loop increment 'i = i * 2' in the method Even() can potentially lead to an infinite loop if 'i' is initialized to 0, as multiplying by 2 will always result in 0, causing the loop to never terminate. This can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) if this code is executed in a server environment, where an infinite loop could consume excessive CPU resources.
Fix: Change the loop increment to ensure it will eventually terminate. If the intention is to print even-indexed elements, the increment should be 'i = i + 2' instead of 'i = i * 2'.
Code Suggestion:

for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i += 2) { System.out.println(arr[i]); }

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T13:50:46Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Code Structure Issue: The method Even should follow Java naming conventions. Method names should start with a lowercase letter.
Fix: Rename the method from Even to even or any other name that starts with a lowercase letter, ensuring it accurately represents the method's functionality.
Code Suggestion:

public static void even(String[] args)

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:21Z

Code Review Agent Run Status

AI Based Review: Successful
Static Analysis: Partially Successful - Failed to execute static code analysis using fb_infer

Code Review Overview

Summary: The PR introduces a method to print even numbers from an array, which complements the existing functionality of printing odd numbers. This addition follows the structure of the existing code, utilizing a similar approach for iterating through the array. However, there are several areas for improvement in terms of code quality, performance, and maintainability.
Code change type: Feature Addition
Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2 - The changes are straightforward and localized to a single file, but require adjustments for optimization and best practices.

The Bito AI Code Review Agent successfully reviewed 1 file and discovered 10 issues. Please review these issues along with suggested fixes in the Changed Files

High-level Feedback

General feedback for improvement involves optimizing the loop for even number extraction, ensuring code reusability, and adhering to Java naming conventions. Additionally, incorporating unit tests to validate the new functionality is crucial for maintaining code quality.

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:24Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Suggestion: Rename the method from "Even" to "printEvenNumbers" to adhere to Java naming conventions and clarify the method's purpose. Refactor the method to improve code reusability and performance by using a modular approach and optimizing the loop condition to avoid potential ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.
Code Suggestion:

- public static void Even(String[] args) { + public static void printEvenNumbers(int[] arr) {

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:25Z

Java/avg/array.java

+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)


Suggestion: Modify the loop to iterate correctly through the array indices for even numbers, avoiding potential ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException and ensuring that all even indices are covered.
Code Suggestion:

- for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2) + for (int i = 1; i < arr.length; i += 2)

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:25Z

Java/avg/array.java

@@ -12,4 +12,15 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
            System.out.println(arr[i]);
        }
    }
+
+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);


Suggestion: Remove the Scanner object instantiation from the "printEvenNumbers" method as it is unused, which cleans up the code and reduces unnecessary object creation.
Code Suggestion:

- Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:25Z

Java/avg/array.java

+
+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};


Suggestion: Consider passing the array as a parameter to the method instead of hardcoding it within, to enhance reusability and facilitate unit testing.
Code Suggestion:

- int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:25Z

Java/avg/array.java

+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }
 }


Suggestion: Add unit tests for the "printEvenNumbers" method to ensure its correct functionality and to facilitate future maintenance and refactoring.
Code Suggestion:

+ // Unit tests should be added to validate the functionality of printEvenNumbers

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:25Z

Java/avg/array.java

+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)


Performance Issue: The loop increment expression 'i = i * 2' in the method Even will lead to an infinite loop if the initial value of 'i' is 0. This is a critical performance issue as it can cause the program to hang.
Fix: Change the loop increment expression to 'i++' or another appropriate increment that ensures the loop can terminate. If the intention is to iterate over even indices, you should use 'i += 2'.
Code Suggestion:

for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i += 2) { System.out.println(arr[i]); }

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:25Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Code Structure Issue: The method Even is not following Java naming conventions. Method names should start with a lowercase letter and follow camelCase notation.
Fix: Rename the method from 'Even' to 'even' to adhere to Java naming conventions.
Code Suggestion:

public static void even(String[] args)

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:25Z

Java/avg/array.java

@@ -12,4 +12,15 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
            System.out.println(arr[i]);
        }
    }
+
+    public static void Even(String[] args) {


Code Structure Issue: The method signature for Even duplicates the main method's signature, which might be misleading regarding its purpose and usage.
Fix: Consider renaming the method to clearly indicate its purpose, or change its parameters to reflect the functionality it provides.
Code Suggestion:

public static void printEvenNumbers()

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:25Z

Java/avg/array.java

@@ -12,4 +12,15 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
            System.out.println(arr[i]);
        }
    }
+
+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);


Code Structure Issue: The Scanner object 'sc' is created but never used in the Even method, which is unnecessary and can be removed to clean up the code.
Fix: Remove the unused Scanner object instantiation to clean up the code.
Code Suggestion:

// Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in); // Removed unused Scanner object

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-22T14:55:25Z

Java/avg/array.java

+    public static void Even(String[] args) {
+        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
+        int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+        System.out.println("Even numbers:");
+
+        for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i = i * 2)
+        {
+            System.out.println(arr[i]);
+        }
+    }


Code Structure Issue: The Even method duplicates functionality with minor differences. Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication and enhance maintainability.
Fix: Refactor the common logic into a separate method that accepts a parameter to differentiate between odd and even number processing.
Code Suggestion:

public static void printNumbers(boolean even) { int[] arr = new int[]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; System.out.println(even ? "Even numbers:" : "Numbers:"); for (int i = even ? 0 : 1; i < arr.length; i += 2) { System.out.println(arr[i]); } }

Amruta101998 · 2024-03-29T06:03:28Z

/review

New code updated

9c8a15f

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Non enterprise test #2

Non enterprise test #2

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 commented Mar 29, 2024

Non enterprise test #2

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Non enterprise test #2

Conversation

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Code Review Agent Run Status

Code Review Overview

High-level Feedback

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Code Review Agent Run Status

Code Review Overview

High-level Feedback

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Code Review Agent Run Status

Code Review Overview

High-level Feedback

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Amruta101998 commented Mar 22, 2024

Code Review Agent Run Status

Code Review Overview

High-level Feedback

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Amruta101998 commented Mar 29, 2024