feat: support create topic and consumer group for e2e tests

[daniel-y]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 89 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b953560) 55.78% compared to head (873f6da) 54.22%.
Report is 351 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #489      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     55.78%   54.22%   -1.57%     
- Complexity      826      833       +7     
============================================
  Files           107      109       +2     
  Lines          6344     6586     +242     
  Branches        599      620      +21     
============================================
+ Hits           3539     3571      +32     
- Misses         2462     2670     +208     
- Partials        343      345       +2     

Components	Coverage Δ
RocketMQ Broker	∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Common	23.33% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Controller	54.16% <ø> (-1.96%)	⬇️
RocketMQ Proxy	34.67% <0.00%> (-2.13%)	⬇️
RocketMQ Store	72.60% <ø> (+0.32%)	⬆️
RocketMQ Stream	∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Metadata	16.36% <ø> (ø)

Files	Coverage Δ
...ocketmq/proxy/remoting/RemotingProtocolServer.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ocketmq/proxy/remoting/activity/AdminActivity.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 15 files with indirect coverage changes

[github-actions]

Qodana for JVM

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [email protected]

• Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
• Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

[daniel-y]

兼容 Remoting 协议的 MQAdmin 还需要更多的 Request Code 支持，比如创建 Topic 需要通过集群名去寻找 Broker，先标记为 Draft