fix: use druid data source for better observability

[lizhanhui]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #660 (5250322) into main (1d88dc0) will increase coverage by 0.29%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 91.17%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #660      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     59.34%   59.63%   +0.29%     
- Complexity     2114     2159      +45     
============================================
  Files           219      224       +5     
  Lines         13641    13853     +212     
  Branches       1252     1283      +31     
============================================
+ Hits           8095     8261     +166     
- Misses         4920     4933      +13     
- Partials        626      659      +33     

Components	Coverage Δ
RocketMQ Broker	∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Common	5.80% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Controller	58.10% <ø> (+2.32%)	⬆️
RocketMQ Proxy	42.62% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Store	77.85% <ø> (+0.24%)	⬆️
RocketMQ Stream	60.78% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️
RocketMQ Metadata	35.29% <ø> (-0.39%)	⬇️

Files	Coverage Δ
...tomq/rocketmq/metadata/DruidDataSourceFactory.java	91.17% <91.17%> (ø)

... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes

[github-actions]

Qodana for JVM

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [email protected]

• Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
• Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions