forked from coderdj/redax
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added hypervisor command ctl to dispatcher loop + config chages #51
Draft
RoBGlaBe
wants to merge
1
commit into
AxFoundation:master
Choose a base branch
from
RoBGlaBe:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This does not include any of the NV/MV crates? Perhaps it is worth a comment in the config
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Totally right. Sorry. I will add descriptions next time. Let me add some for this one now:
The only change for the dispatcher is that it commands the Hypervisor to look for commands in the db and execute them, now. The actual point where this bit is called in the dispatcher's event loop is probably the most critical bit. At the end of the loop, all the changes depending on the current status should have been executed already, that's why mostly Darryl (but I agree, as far as I can tell), think that either the end of the loop or the beginnig (which is more or less the same spot) would be the best place to put it. Do you see a reason why this wouldn't be a good idea?
In the Hypervisor (mentioned daqnt PR) we now want to have access to NIM IPs, also. That's why we extended the config. Darryl wanted a nested dict for that. I hope I found all the places, where we thus require to ask for the VME part of the nested dict, instead of using the entire dict, as before. I also changed the naming to be consistent with what the object holds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What kind of comment would you like?
In some nuclear restart option, I think all the crates (so far only VME) are shut down and restarted. So every crate we add here will be affected by this. So that's probably at least one thing we should consider before adding more crates here. Maybe we want this even.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Having looked a bit into PR46, I think this is a fine place for such an option.
The comment I would add explicitly is that these are all the TPC crates, not all crates.