-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 991
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Regulatory Compliance Policy Assignment Flexibility Feature #1588
Merged
jtracey93
merged 68 commits into
main
from
feat/add-regulatroy-compliance-policy-selector
Mar 4, 2024
Merged
Add Regulatory Compliance Policy Assignment Flexibility Feature #1588
jtracey93
merged 68 commits into
main
from
feat/add-regulatroy-compliance-policy-selector
Mar 4, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…s://github.com/Azure/Enterprise-Scale into feat/add-regulatroy-compliance-policy-selector
…SovBaseGlobalRegions
…s://github.com/Azure/Enterprise-Scale into feat/add-regulatroy-compliance-policy-selector
jtracey93
added
Type: Enhancement ✨
New feature or request
Type: Feature Request ➕
New feature or request
Area: Policy 📝
Issues / PR's related to Policy
labels
Mar 3, 2024
arjenhuitema
requested changes
Mar 4, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some minor typo's.
Rest LGTM.
Co-authored-by: Arjen Huitema <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Arjen Huitema <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Arjen Huitema <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Arjen Huitema <[email protected]>
arjenhuitema
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Policy 📝
Issues / PR's related to Policy
Type: Enhancement ✨
New feature or request
Type: Feature Request ➕
New feature or request
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview/Summary
This pull request introduces changes to the
eslzArm/eslzArm.json
file to incorporate Regulatory Compliance policies. The changes primarily involve the addition of new parameters and deployment configurations to support these policies.Key changes include:
New Parameters:
regulatoryComplianceInitativesToAssign
,regCompPolParAusGovIsmRestrictedVmAdminsExclude
,regCompPolParMPAAApplicationName
, and others. These parameters are used to configure and control the application of the Regulatory Compliance policies.Deployment Configuration:
regulatoryComplianceInitativesToAssignDeploymentName
) and the deployment URI (regulatoryComplianceInitaitves
). [1] [2]Deployment Resource:
Breaking Changes
None
Testing Evidence
Testing URLs
Azure Public
As part of this Pull Request I have
main
branch/docs/wiki/whats-new.md
)