Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get instance id for desired control-queue(s) #1069

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
90 changes: 90 additions & 0 deletions Test/DurableTask.AzureStorage.Tests/TestPartitionIndex.cs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Copyright Microsoft Corporation
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

namespace DurableTask.AzureStorage.Tests
{
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Threading;
using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;

[TestClass]
public class TestPartitionIndex
{
private AzureStorageOrchestrationService azureStorageOrchestrationService;
private AzureStorageOrchestrationServiceSettings settings;
private int partitionCount = 4;
private CancellationTokenSource cancellationTokenSource;
private const string TaskHub = "taskHubName";

private Dictionary<uint, string> partitionToInstanceId = new Dictionary<uint, string>()
{
{ 0, "sampleinstanceid!13"},
{ 1, "sampleinstanceid!3"},
{ 2, "sampleinstanceid!1!"},
{ 3, "sampleinstanceid!1"}
};

private Dictionary<uint, string> partitionToInstanceIdWithExplicitPartitionPlacement = new Dictionary<uint, string>()
{
{ 0, "sampleinstanceid!0"},
{ 1, "sampleinstanceid!2!1"},
{ 2, "sampleinstanceid!2"},
{ 3, "sampleinstanceid!3"}
};

[TestInitialize]
public void Initialize()
{
cancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource();

settings = new AzureStorageOrchestrationServiceSettings()
{
StorageConnectionString = TestHelpers.GetTestStorageAccountConnectionString(),
TaskHubName = TaskHub,
PartitionCount = partitionCount
};

azureStorageOrchestrationService = new AzureStorageOrchestrationService(settings);
}

[TestMethod]
public void GetPartitionIndexTest_EnableExplicitPartitionPlacement_False()
{
settings.EnableExplicitPartitionPlacement = false;

foreach (var kvp in partitionToInstanceId)
{
var instanceId = kvp.Value;
var expectedPartitionIndex = kvp.Key;
var partitionIndex = azureStorageOrchestrationService.GetPartitionIndex(instanceId);

Assert.AreEqual(expectedPartitionIndex, partitionIndex);
}
}

[TestMethod]
public void GetPartitionIndexTest_EnableExplicitPartitionPlacement_True()
{
settings.EnableExplicitPartitionPlacement = true;

foreach (var kvp in partitionToInstanceIdWithExplicitPartitionPlacement)
{
var instanceId = kvp.Value;
var expectedPartitionIndex = kvp.Key;
var partitionIndex = azureStorageOrchestrationService.GetPartitionIndex(instanceId);

Assert.AreEqual(expectedPartitionIndex, partitionIndex);
}
}
}
}
28 changes: 26 additions & 2 deletions src/DurableTask.AzureStorage/AzureStorageOrchestrationService.cs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2048,9 +2048,9 @@ public Task<string> DownloadBlobAsync(string blobUri)

// TODO: Change this to a sticky assignment so that partition count changes can
// be supported: https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-durable-extension/issues/1
async Task<ControlQueue?> GetControlQueueAsync(string instanceId)
internal async Task<ControlQueue?> GetControlQueueAsync(string instanceId)
{
uint partitionIndex = Fnv1aHashHelper.ComputeHash(instanceId) % (uint)this.settings.PartitionCount;
uint partitionIndex = GetPartitionIndex(instanceId);
string queueName = GetControlQueueName(this.settings.TaskHubName, (int)partitionIndex);

ControlQueue cachedQueue;
Expand All @@ -2075,6 +2075,30 @@ public Task<string> DownloadBlobAsync(string blobUri)
return cachedQueue;
}

internal uint GetPartitionIndex(string instanceId)
{
uint totalPartitions = (uint)this.settings.PartitionCount;

int placementSeparatorPosition = instanceId.LastIndexOf('!');

// if the instance id ends with !nnn, where nnn is an unsigned number, it indicates explicit partition placement
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we add a test that documents the behavior if the customer uses an instanceID with multiple ! in there? Say instanceID "A!1!B!3` should probably map to partition "3", right?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's also add a test that checks that instanceID myinstanceID!NotANumber does not trigger any errors / that it correctly ignores the explicit placement logic.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for adding the first test, I think we're just missing the very last one:

Let's also add a test that checks that instanceID myinstanceID!NotANumber does not trigger any errors / that it correctly ignores the explicit placement logic.

// if the instance id has multiple ! then only the last one will be considered. i.e., abd!2!3 then !3 will be considered.
// and if the instance id ends with !, then it will considered in non '!nnn' format and hashing will be used for control-queue placement.
if (
this.settings.EnableExplicitPartitionPlacement
&& placementSeparatorPosition != -1
&& uint.TryParse(instanceId.Substring(placementSeparatorPosition + 1), out uint index))
{
var partitionId = index % totalPartitions;
return (uint)partitionId;
}
else
{
return Fnv1aHashHelper.ComputeHash(instanceId) % totalPartitions;

}
}

/// <summary>
/// Disposes of the current object.
/// </summary>
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -318,5 +318,12 @@ internal LogHelper Logger
/// Consumers that require separate dispatch (such as the new out-of-proc v2 SDKs) must set this to true.
/// </summary>
public bool UseSeparateQueueForEntityWorkItems { get; set; } = false;

/// <summary>
/// Whether to allow instanceIDs to use special syntax to land on a specific partition.
/// If enabled, when an instanceID ends with suffix '!nnn', where 'nnn' is an unsigned number, the instance will land on the partition/queue for to that number.
/// ** DO NOT CHANGE THIS FLAG FOR PRE-EXISTING MESSAGES AS IT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN THE WRONG QUEUE **
/// </summary>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit - I believe remark is the right docs tag for this sort of thing. Let's also not use all-caps for comments, I realize it has a useful effect, but it's not in our usual style for customer-facing docs.

Suggested change
/// <summary>
/// Whether to allow instanceIDs to use special syntax to land on a specific partition.
/// If enabled, when an instanceID ends with suffix '!nnn', where 'nnn' is an unsigned number, the instance will land on the partition/queue for to that number.
/// ** DO NOT CHANGE THIS FLAG FOR PRE-EXISTING MESSAGES AS IT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN THE WRONG QUEUE **
/// </summary>
/// <summary>
/// Whether to allow instanceIDs to use special syntax to land on a specific partition.
/// If enabled, when an instanceID ends with suffix '!nnn', where 'nnn' is an unsigned number, the instance will land on the partition/queue for to that number.
/// ** DO NOT CHANGE THIS FLAG FOR PRE-EXISTING MESSAGES AS IT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN THE WRONG QUEUE **
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// It is not generally safe to change to this flag for pre-existing TaskHubs, as it may change the expected target queue for an instanceID.
/// </remarks>

public bool EnableExplicitPartitionPlacement { get; set; } = false;
}
}
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions src/DurableTask.Core/TaskHubClient.cs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ public Task TerminateInstanceAsync(OrchestrationInstance orchestrationInstance)
}

/// <summary>
/// Add test for this.
/// Forcefully terminate the specified orchestration instance with a reason
/// </summary>
/// <param name="orchestrationInstance">Instance to terminate</param>
Expand Down
Loading