Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance Documentation in the Project #76 #82

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

josephpdf
Copy link
Contributor

@josephpdf josephpdf commented Oct 25, 2024

Pull Request Overview

📝 Summary

🔄 Changes Made

The changes made were:

  • Created a new directory named docs with a subdirectory called contribution.
  • Moved the CONTRIBUTION.md file to the contribution folder.
  • Created a templates directory inside .github.
  • Moved the PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md file to the templates directory.
  • Added a new file named ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md with various sections, using examples from the issues in ODHack9 as references.

🔧 Tests Results

🔜 Next Steps

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the link to the contribution guidelines in the README for improved accessibility.
    • Introduced a new structured issue template to guide users in submitting detailed issue reports, enhancing clarity and organization.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to two files: README.md and .github/templates/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md. In README.md, the link to the contribution guidelines has been updated from a relative path to a more specific path within the docs directory, enhancing clarity regarding the document's location. The overall structure and content of the README remain unchanged, ensuring that existing sections such as prerequisites and installation instructions are preserved.

In the .github/templates/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md file, a new issue template has been created, which includes several structured sections: "Issue," "Description," "Summary," "Deliverable," "References," and "Notes." Each section is visually marked with an emoji to improve usability. This addition aims to facilitate better issue reporting by providing a clear framework for users to follow when submitting issues.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Create a new docs directory
Inside the new dir create a contribution directory
Place the Contribution guidelines inside of it
Create a template for the issues
Both templates moved to the correct place The issue template was created, but the pull request does not indicate that the pull request template was moved.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add contribution guidelines #47: The changes in the main PR update the link to the contribution guidelines, which directly relates to the introduction of the CONTRIBUTION.md file in this PR.
  • README improvements #72: This PR includes updates to the contribution guidelines, which are referenced in the main PR's changes to the README.md, indicating a connection in the documentation related to contributions.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 299a499 and edaf793.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

123-123: Consider updating the relative path.

While the current path works, consider using a more robust path that starts from the repository root:

-[CONTRIBUTION GUIDELINES](./docs/contribution/CONTRIBUTION.md)
+[CONTRIBUTION GUIDELINES](/docs/contribution/CONTRIBUTION.md)

This ensures the link works correctly regardless of where the README is being viewed (e.g., on GitHub, in documentation sites, etc.).

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38a20c2 and 32d86a4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/templates/TEMPLATE.md (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/templates/TEMPLATE.md
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

123-123: LGTM! Verify the new path exists.

The updated link to the contribution guidelines aligns with the PR objectives of reorganizing documentation.

Let's verify the new path exists:

✅ Verification successful

Link update verified and no other references found

The contribution guidelines file exists at the new location (docs/contribution/CONTRIBUTION.md), and no other markdown files reference the old path, confirming this is a clean move.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the contribution guidelines file exists at the new location
# and check for any other references to the old path

# Test 1: Check if the new path exists
if [ -f "docs/contribution/CONTRIBUTION.md" ]; then
    echo "✅ CONTRIBUTION.md exists at the new location"
else
    echo "❌ CONTRIBUTION.md not found at docs/contribution/CONTRIBUTION.md"
fi

# Test 2: Search for any remaining references to the old path
rg -l "CONTRIBUTION\.md" --type md --glob '!README.md'

Length of output: 202

@danielcdz danielcdz added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 25, 2024
.github/templates/TEMPLATE.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@danielcdz
Copy link
Contributor

@josephpdf Can you translate the PR description steps you added to English, please?

@josephpdf
Copy link
Contributor Author

@josephpdf Can you translate the PR description steps you added to English, please?

I was wrong, but I already changed the language.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @josephpdf, please update this file CONTRIBUTION.md by adding the content/file from: Contribution Guidelines Thanks! 🫡

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @josephpdf, please use the following structure for this Pull Request Template:

Pull Request Overview

📝 Summary

  • Closes # number issue
  • Brief summary

🔄 Changes Made

  • Add changes made

🔧 Tests Results

  • Add images to validate your results

Copy link
Contributor

@danielcdz danielcdz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@coxmars coxmars left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@danielcdz danielcdz merged commit 84db185 into ByteBuildersLabs:main Oct 30, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enhance Documentation in the Project
3 participants