Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using bayeux to organize numpyro models and access features #244

Open
SamuelBrand1 opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Using bayeux to organize numpyro models and access features #244

SamuelBrand1 opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@SamuelBrand1
Copy link
Contributor

@dylanhmorris has put me onto bayeux. I think this would be a useful addition.

bayeux has some handy features:

@SamuelBrand1 SamuelBrand1 added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 28, 2024
@dylanhmorris
Copy link

Passing along credit: @damonbayer put me onto bayeux

@SamuelBrand1
Copy link
Contributor Author

As of #248 we have access to bayeux debug. Do we want to use any other package integrations (e.g. MAP opt to start in a high probability mass region for NUTS), or is this issue closed?

@arik-shurygin arik-shurygin added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Oct 16, 2024
@arik-shurygin
Copy link
Collaborator

tagging this issue as wontfix for now, I think more investment is needed to unlock the usefulness of the bayeux debugging. Unfortunately there are many other high priority items on the docket as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants