You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In exploring means to improve MCMC, I tested out Laplace approximations to the posterior for use as a mass matrix. As a mass matrix it was a failure, but at some point it might be nice to enable some form(s) of approximate inference. Development cycles could be notably faster with the right one, bypassing MCMC entirely.
This, put where MCMC is currently run in retrospective_forecasting/main.py, works to get samples from a Laplace approximation. (Note that they are apparently unnamed, unlike those returned from MCMC, so some effort to determine the order may be necessary.)
In exploring means to improve MCMC, I tested out Laplace approximations to the posterior for use as a mass matrix. As a mass matrix it was a failure, but at some point it might be nice to enable some form(s) of approximate inference. Development cycles could be notably faster with the right one, bypassing MCMC entirely.
This, put where MCMC is currently run in
retrospective_forecasting/main.py
, works to get samples from a Laplace approximation. (Note that they are apparently unnamed, unlike those returned from MCMC, so some effort to determine the order may be necessary.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: