You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Especially for future automatic aggregation purposes, it would be nice to be able to access something like genetic distances or imputed mutations on branches of the taxonomy tree.
Some "type" specimen (or first sequence with a label) plus parsimony counting could work.
Interfacing with a more real-data phylogeny would be potentially nice, but would likely only work if we could turn that into a taxonomy tree directly and only if we used it (otherwise we're matching branches awkwardly).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Especially for future automatic aggregation purposes, it would be nice to be able to access something like genetic distances or imputed mutations on branches of the taxonomy tree.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: