Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fill in mapping for OML/ORM #1626

Open
2 of 7 tasks
brick-green opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 7 comments
Open
2 of 7 tasks

Fill in mapping for OML/ORM #1626

brick-green opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@brick-green
Copy link

brick-green commented Nov 27, 2024

Backlog Task

Following the OML/ORM mapping work completed by RS there remains a number of fields that unmapped.

  • PID-2 - Missing because PID-2 is "Backwards Compatible" field in 2.5.1

  • PID-12 - Missing because PID-12 is "Backwards Compatible" field in 2.5.1

  • PID.19 and PID.20 - are deprecated in the HL7v2.7 and NIST HL7v2.5.1 specs. Further, the HAPI v2.7 model has set both # fields to NULLDT.

  • ORC-7 - Missing because ORC-7 is "Backwards Compatible" field in 2.5.1

  • OBR-27- Missing because OBR-27 is "Backwards Compatible" field in 2.5.1

  • SPM-35 - Missing because SPM-35 does not exist in 2.5.1

Precondition

  • We have recent sample order messages from Ochsner - attached below in the comments as "input.txt" and "output.txt"

Completion Criteria

  • Above fields can be mapped into FHIR and back out to HL7 for OML
  • Above fields can be mapped into FHIR and back out to HL7 for OML

Tasks

Other Notes

@JohnNKing
Copy link
Contributor

ORC-7 not available in HL7 v2.7. May well be an issue with the other fields.

@basiliskus
Copy link
Contributor

Need to check latest OML mapping in RS to confirm fields are missing

@GilmoreA6
Copy link
Contributor

input.txt

@GilmoreA6
Copy link
Contributor

output.txt

@JohnNKing
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like I may also need to add PID-12 to the list above (based on recent sample messages for LA)

@basiliskus
Copy link
Contributor

basiliskus commented Jan 13, 2025

Differences based on last RS version and Gilmore's input OML above

@JohnNKing
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @basiliskus ! That matches what I'm seeing. I'll pull this back into the Refinement column for tomorrow -- specifically to ask the team about adding PID-12 to this scope. For the Feeding Type OBX (67704-7), I'll create a new story. It seems to be related to fields that repeat.

@tjohnson7021 tjohnson7021 self-assigned this Jan 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants