Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of UTU comments to EO guide #1629

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 19, 2023
Merged

Implementation of UTU comments to EO guide #1629

merged 8 commits into from
Apr 19, 2023

Conversation

samumantha
Copy link
Contributor

@samumantha samumantha commented Apr 3, 2023

  • typo fixes
  • more info on data/sensor/software choices

All edits based on suggestions by UTU (Teams document).

Images left out for now, they require a bit more thinking. But good future topic.

related #1549

Comments and further suggestions welcome

@samumantha samumantha changed the title WIP: Implementation of UTU comments to EO guide Implementation of UTU comments to EO guide Apr 4, 2023
@samumantha samumantha requested a review from ktiits April 4, 2023 13:12
@samumantha samumantha marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2023 13:13
@samumantha samumantha requested a review from katrite April 4, 2023 13:18
@ktiits
Copy link
Contributor

ktiits commented Apr 4, 2023

I would put Microsoft planetary under Cloud services, it in the end is similar to DIAS, data is object storage, you run your own VMs to do something. May-be some Jupyters also, but one is not limited by Microsoft tools, but can use own. Not so familiar, but SentinelHub likely could be EO specific service?
Rest reviewed and ok.

@samumantha
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added Sentinelhub, but I understood that the planetary computer is more than DIAS but less than GEE, somewhat in between. I think it still fits the EO specific services,so left it there but also added it as example to cloud.

@joonas-somero joonas-somero merged commit 3eb2b97 into master Apr 19, 2023
@joonas-somero joonas-somero deleted the swi_eo branch April 19, 2023 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants