to extend polkadot/caip10 to include "implicit/not-yet-derived" CAIP-2 #20
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Update: since caips#160, |
|
in terms of wildcards and non-chain IDs in the chainId segment of CAIP-10, there is now precedent in another namespace that may be relevant to this PR: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I realized that "polkadot:-:{address}" scheme would break CAIP-2 because
-is no more a validchainIDthanIn any case, I'm still not sure this complexity is justified by real polkadot usage so I'm going to leave this PR open until I hear from people that have experience of that ecosystem and its practices.