-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add skeleton for product support SLE Micro OS with name slmicro5 #12028
Add skeleton for product support SLE Micro OS with name slmicro5 #12028
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
🤖 A k8s content image for this PR is available at: Click here to see how to deploy itIf you alread have Compliance Operator deployed: Otherwise deploy the content and operator together by checking out ComplianceAsCode/compliance-operator and: |
Thus achieveing several goals: - Avoid checks in jinja if *sle* in platform, when assuming sle12 or sle15 - Current SUSE Linux Enterprise MicroOS support targets only major version 5 of the platfom so SLE MicroOS v6 and above is target to future developments - Due to confusion in platfrom multi_platform checks the installed_OS_is check was failiing to compile fully
42af8d2
to
7975614
Compare
This datastream diff is auto generated by the check Click here to see the full diffOVAL for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_installed_OS_is_vendor_supported' differs.
--- oval:ssg-installed_OS_is_vendor_supported:def:1
+++ oval:ssg-installed_OS_is_vendor_supported:def:1
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
extend_definition oval:ssg-installed_OS_is_ol8:def:1
extend_definition oval:ssg-installed_OS_is_sle12:def:1
extend_definition oval:ssg-installed_OS_is_sle15:def:1
+extend_definition oval:ssg-installed_OS_is_slmicro5:def:1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so far looks great
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ identifiers: | |||
cce@rhel9: CCE-83453-1 | |||
cce@sle12: CCE-83001-8 | |||
cce@sle15: CCE-83260-0 | |||
cce@slmicro5: CCE-93601-3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will there be a CCE pool file, similar to shared/references/cce-sle15-avail.txt
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For sure there is a pending PR #12109 on me for that, that I will review/merge as soon as the current one is approved
|
||
reference: https://public.cyber.mil/stigs/downloads/?_dl_facet_stigs=operating-systems%2Cunix-linux | ||
|
||
title: 'SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro (SLEM) 5' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There should be STIG in the profile title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks added in 96606f8
Thanks to @jan-cerny for the feedback
Code Climate has analyzed commit 96606f8 and detected 2 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 59.4% (0.0% change). View more on Code Climate. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have built the slmicro5 product. I have seen the built data stream. I have also read the generated HTML guide for STIG.
The CI fail isn't caused by the contents of this PR. The Code Climate problem is a false positive. |
Description:
Rationale:
Internals