Add centauri-chain.md #3742
Merged
Add centauri-chain.md #3742
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JafarAz
added
the
Misc
blasrodri
approved these changes
Jun 28, 2023
0xBrainjar2
reviewed
Jun 28, 2023
| Once the Picasso connection is established, the remaining 9 billion PICA tokens can also be transferred to Centauri, allowing users to delegate to those validators as well. The rewards mentioned earlier are distributed among the staked users, including both delegators and validators. Any new validator can join the active set and remove an existing genesis validator should they hold a higher stake. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Governance | ||
| Similar to the way Cosmos chains operate, validators can vote using tokens they are delegated with. However, if the delegator votes themselves, it will override the validator’s vote. The parameters for the governance on the Centauri chain are as follows: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you say that governance controlled by PICA
0xBrainjar2
reviewed
Jun 28, 2023
| | Parameter | Period/Number | | ||
| |----------------------------------------------------|----------------| | ||
| | Total Deposit | 2 days | | ||
| | Quorum | 30% | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
plz also add chain parameters like unbonding period etc
kkast
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2023
- [x] PR title is my best effort to provide summary of changes and has clear text to be part of release notes - [x] I marked PR by `misc` label if it should not be in release notes - [ ] I have linked Zenhub/Github or any other reference item if one exists - [ ] I was clear on what type of deployment required to release my changes (node, runtime, contract, indexer, on chain operation, frontend, infrastructure) if any in PR title or description - [ ] I waited and did best effort for `pr-workflow-check / draft-release-check` to finish with success(green check mark) with my changes - [ ] I have added at least one reviewer in reviewers list - [ ] I tagged(@) or used other form of notification of one person who I think can handle best review of this PR - [ ] I have proved that PR has no general regressions of relevant features and processes required to release into production
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
misclabel if it should not be in release notespr-workflow-check / draft-release-checkto finish with success(green check mark) with my changes