Proposal for limit page update #2263
Conversation
|
Preview available here |
| </table> | ||
| Your {{< product-c8y-iot >}} service includes so-called ``quotas``. These quotas ensure that the service operates within the guarantees of the {{< product-c8y-iot >}} service-level agreements. | ||
|
|
||
| There are three types of quotas in {{< product-c8y-iot >}}: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the 3rd type of quotas is not present in the list below, is that intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, well spotted. It was just the idea that we could have plans with different limits. I'll commit it out until we have that facility.
| |[Notifications 2.0 message backlog](/change-logs/?#cumulocity-undefined-advance-notice-of-reduced-storage-limits-for-notifications-2.0-and-microservice-based-data-broker)|Hard|25 MB| | ||
| |[Notifications 2.0 time-to-live](/change-logs/?#cumulocity-undefined-advance-notice-of-reduced-storage-limits-for-notifications-2.0-and-microservice-based-data-broker)|Hard|36 hours| | ||
| |[Microservice-based data broker message backlog](/change-logs/?#cumulocity-undefined-advance-notice-of-reduced-storage-limits-for-notifications-2.0-and-microservice-based-data-broker)|Hard|50 MB| | ||
| |[Microservice-based data broker time-to-live](/change-logs/?#cumulocity-undefined-advance-notice-of-reduced-storage-limits-for-notifications-2.0-and-microservice-based-data-broker)|Hard|36 hours| |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These are technically all configurable and we document how to configure them, hence my question in the doc about whether "configurable" is a type of limit or a property of limits.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@scmi-c8y For me, there is a difference between what you can theoretically configure by manipulating internal configuration files and what we offer generally to be configurable.
You can increase the size of message backlogs or the array limit in CDH, but I assume that the system has not been tested with the setup and there are consequences to system dimensioning (file system space? memory usage? -- otherwise the limit would not be there in the first place).
So rather than giving a carte blanche to change it, I would document it as hard limit. What we could do, though, is to offer a professional service to test for different hard limits for customers.
|
I''ll close this pull request; further discussion can be carried out as part of PR #2452 |
This is a draft PR, general review is not yet required.