Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rename bad funcs instead of removing their samples #4

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

felixge
Copy link
Member

@felixge felixge commented Jun 6, 2024

Removing the samples for functions that have known inlining issues skews the PGO profile and might cause previously cold functions to be promoted to hot functions.

It's probably not a big issue, but this is an easy improvement to make, so why not.

Kudos to Michael Pratt for pointing this out pointing this out in #3 (comment)

Removing the samples for functions that have known inlining issues skews
the PGO profile and might cause previously cold functions to be promoted
to hot functions.

It's probably not a big issue, but this is an easy improvement to make,
so why not.

Kudos to Michael Pratt for pointing this out pointing this out in
#3 (comment)
@felixge felixge force-pushed the felix.geisendoerfer/PROF-9665-improve-workaround branch from 1830482 to b21d138 Compare June 6, 2024 06:26
Copy link

@nsrip-dd nsrip-dd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@felixge felixge merged commit 3c4cc2e into main Jun 6, 2024
2 checks passed
@felixge felixge deleted the felix.geisendoerfer/PROF-9665-improve-workaround branch June 6, 2024 11:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants