-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Corrections on Answers #17
Conversation
"The Developers are always accountable for: creating a plan for the Sprint (the Sprint Backlog); instilling quality by adhering to the Definition of Done; adapting their plan each day toward the Sprint Goal; and holding each other accountable as professionals." This fragment highlights that the team is responsible for ensuring quality, meaning that testing tasks are also the responsibility of the Developers. In this case, raising an impediment due to a lack of testing expertise is not a valid option. "Product Backlog refinement is the act of breaking down and further defining Product Backlog items into smaller, more precise items. This is an ongoing activity that adds details such as a description, order, and size. The Developers who will be doing the work are responsible for sizing. The Product Owner may influence the Developers by helping them understand and select trade-offs, but the Developers are responsible for the sizing." Considering that refinement is a collaborative effort and that the Developers are responsible for sizing the items, the correct option is "The Developers, with support from the Product Owner, who is still accountable for it." "The Scrum Team identifies the most helpful changes to improve its effectiveness. The most impactful improvements are addressed as soon as possible and may even be added to the Sprint Backlog for the next Sprint." Based on this, when an improvement is identified, the team must place the item in the Sprint Backlog. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Alberti <[email protected]>
@ejalberti are you sure about To me, |
|
It looks like 2 more questions are also missing |
https://www.quora.com/Who-is-responsible-for-product-backlog-refinement#:~:text=The%20product%20owner%20is%20responsible,making%20stories%20ready%20for%20planning%20… + officials forum threads |
Could add |
closed as there was no reply, these |
"The Developers are always accountable for: creating a plan for the Sprint (the Sprint Backlog); instilling quality by adhering to the Definition of Done; adapting their plan each day toward the Sprint Goal; and holding each other accountable as professionals." This fragment highlights that the team is responsible for ensuring quality, meaning that testing tasks are also the responsibility of the Developers. In this case, raising an impediment due to a lack of testing expertise is not a valid option.
"Product Backlog refinement is the act of breaking down and further defining Product Backlog items into smaller, more precise items. This is an ongoing activity that adds details such as a description, order, and size. The Developers who will be doing the work are responsible for sizing. The Product Owner may influence the Developers by helping them understand and select trade-offs, but the Developers are responsible for the sizing." Considering that refinement is a collaborative effort and that the Developers are responsible for sizing the items, the correct option is "The Developers, with support from the Product Owner, who is still accountable for it."
"The Scrum Team identifies the most helpful changes to improve its effectiveness. The most impactful improvements are addressed as soon as possible and may even be added to the Sprint Backlog for the next Sprint." Based on this, when an improvement is identified, the team must place the item in the Sprint Backlog.