Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrections on Answers #17

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Corrections on Answers #17

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ejalberti
Copy link

"The Developers are always accountable for: creating a plan for the Sprint (the Sprint Backlog); instilling quality by adhering to the Definition of Done; adapting their plan each day toward the Sprint Goal; and holding each other accountable as professionals." This fragment highlights that the team is responsible for ensuring quality, meaning that testing tasks are also the responsibility of the Developers. In this case, raising an impediment due to a lack of testing expertise is not a valid option.

"Product Backlog refinement is the act of breaking down and further defining Product Backlog items into smaller, more precise items. This is an ongoing activity that adds details such as a description, order, and size. The Developers who will be doing the work are responsible for sizing. The Product Owner may influence the Developers by helping them understand and select trade-offs, but the Developers are responsible for the sizing." Considering that refinement is a collaborative effort and that the Developers are responsible for sizing the items, the correct option is "The Developers, with support from the Product Owner, who is still accountable for it."

"The Scrum Team identifies the most helpful changes to improve its effectiveness. The most impactful improvements are addressed as soon as possible and may even be added to the Sprint Backlog for the next Sprint." Based on this, when an improvement is identified, the team must place the item in the Sprint Backlog.

"The Developers are always accountable for: creating a plan for the
Sprint (the Sprint Backlog); instilling quality by adhering to the
Definition of Done; adapting their plan each day toward the Sprint Goal;
and holding each other accountable as professionals." This fragment
highlights that the team is responsible for ensuring quality, meaning
that testing tasks are also the responsibility of the Developers.
In this case, raising an impediment due to a lack of testing expertise
is not a valid option.

"Product Backlog refinement is the act of breaking down and further
defining Product Backlog items into smaller, more precise items. This
is an ongoing activity that adds details such as a description, order,
and size. The Developers who will be doing the work are responsible for
sizing. The Product Owner may influence the Developers by helping them
understand and select trade-offs, but the Developers are responsible
for the sizing." Considering that refinement is a collaborative effort
and that the Developers are responsible for sizing the items, the
correct option is "The Developers, with support from the Product Owner,
who is still accountable for it."

"The Scrum Team identifies the most helpful changes to improve its
effectiveness. The most impactful improvements are addressed as soon as
possible and may even be added to the Sprint Backlog for the next
Sprint." Based on this, when an improvement is identified, the team must
place the item in the Sprint Backlog.

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Alberti <[email protected]>
@danieldanielecki
Copy link
Member

@ejalberti are you sure about The Scrum Team must choose at least one high priority process improvement item, identified during the Sprint Retrospective, and place it in the Sprint Backlog.?

To me, False is still correct, because it seems to me you're confusing with Product Backlog, for which it'd be indeed True.

@danieldanielecki
Copy link
Member

Among the Developers, there is nobody with significant testing expertise. They should... definitely disagree, but seeing https://www.coursehero.com/file/p78pam1e/Done-Increments-If-this-has-become-an-Impediment-then-the-Scrum-Master-has-the/ I could add Pick 2 as it's only in the table of contents...

@danieldanielecki
Copy link
Member

Among the Developers, there is nobody with significant testing expertise. They should... definitely disagree, but seeing https://www.coursehero.com/file/p78pam1e/Done-Increments-If-this-has-become-an-Impediment-then-the-Scrum-Master-has-the/ I could add Pick 2 as it's only in the table of contents...

It looks like 2 more questions are also missing pick ... in its question

@danieldanielecki
Copy link
Member

Who can do the work to ensure the Product Backlog is refined to a state that it is useful? - disagree again

https://www.quora.com/Who-is-responsible-for-product-backlog-refinement#:~:text=The%20product%20owner%20is%20responsible,making%20stories%20ready%20for%20planning%20… + officials forum threads

@danieldanielecki
Copy link
Member

Who can do the work to ensure the Product Backlog is refined to a state that it is useful? - disagree again

https://www.quora.com/Who-is-responsible-for-product-backlog-refinement#:~:text=The%20product%20owner%20is%20responsible,making%20stories%20ready%20for%20planning%20… + officials forum threads

Could add Pick 2 again, as it's only in the contents

@danieldanielecki
Copy link
Member

closed as there was no reply, these Pick-related improvements from the comments, will be part of #12

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants