Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(doc): extend branch-restriction documentation example to show username usage #202

Merged

Conversation

Nkmol
Copy link

@Nkmol Nkmol commented May 1, 2024

A small PR to show that users use Bitbucket usernames, instead of uuids.

Closes #53

@Nkmol
Copy link
Author

Nkmol commented May 1, 2024

Meanwhile, I am reading through #173, but believe this can still be added as it describes the current way of defining users which still works.

Copy link
Owner

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 merged commit 3c7b99e into DrFaust92:master May 2, 2024
3 checks passed
@Nkmol Nkmol deleted the extend-branch-restriction-doc-for-username branch May 3, 2024 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bitbucket_branch_restriction doesn't handle "users" changes properly for "restrict_merges"
2 participants