-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
settle on IO naming scheme #3001
Comments
For rhist files, you have |
Side question: do ppl prefer |
Maybe just |
Updated the op with Peter's recommendation as well as Luca's recommendation. |
Should we set an end date for this discussion? That is, if no objection is heard by Oct X, we just implement what we currently have in the table above? |
I'm going to propose another convention for the suffixes:
|
I like .r and .h, but why .h.r instead of .rh or .hr? Extra periods seem annoying. |
Well, it would have allowed me to treat all restart files with a single regex in config_archive.xml. Lazy me. I will go with |
In config_archive.xml, we should distinguishe between the three types, so I don't think you will gain anything from any shortcut here. Let's go with e.g., for EAM <rest_file_extension>[ri]</rest_file_extension>
<rest_file_extension>rh\d*</rest_file_extension>
<rest_file_extension>rs</rest_file_extension>
<hist_file_extension>h\d*.*\.nc$</hist_file_extension> |
I just thought that that XML syntax does not explain the kind of restart file. Since CIME does not seem to care about the fine-grain distinction about model/hist/surface restart files, I was thinking that just using But yeah, I ended up using rh for model output restart files. |
We should likely settle on a naming scheme for our IO. Currently, we have three different file classes of interest, with differing schemes
Proposed changes
Some notes
Rationale
Comment and vote below!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: