Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test of IOTA nonlinear magnet model with physical aperture. #802

Merged

Conversation

cemitch99
Copy link
Member

@cemitch99 cemitch99 commented Jan 17, 2025

This test combines a physical model of the IOTA nonlinear magnetic insert with realistic transverse aperture restrictions.

Follow-up to #795 Adds coverage for #762

  • initial draft of example input
  • add documentation
  • add analysis script

@cemitch99 cemitch99 requested a review from ax3l January 17, 2025 02:03
@cemitch99
Copy link
Member Author

cemitch99 commented Jan 17, 2025

Note that build is failing during testing.
Resolved.

@ax3l ax3l self-assigned this Jan 17, 2025
@ax3l ax3l added the component: tests examples, tests and benchmarks label Jan 17, 2025
entrance to the nonlinear element, and then again after the thin lens (representing a
single period). These values should be unchanged for all particles (to within acceptable tolerance).

In this test, the initial and final values of :math:`\mu_H`, :math:`\sigma_H`, :math:`\mu_I`, :math:`\sigma_I` must agree with nominal values.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
In this test, the initial and final values of :math:`\mu_H`, :math:`\sigma_H`, :math:`\mu_I`, :math:`\sigma_I` must agree with nominal values.
In this test, the initial and final values of :math:`\mu_H`, :math:`\sigma_H`, :math:`\mu_I`, :math:`\sigma_I` and the number of lost particles in apertures must agree with nominal values.

examples/iota_lens/README.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@ax3l ax3l left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great!

Minor suggestion for the test description, feel free to merge when ready.

cemitch99 and others added 2 commits January 17, 2025 17:50
Change objective description.
@cemitch99 cemitch99 merged commit e78a9fc into ECP-WarpX:development Jan 18, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component: tests examples, tests and benchmarks
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants