-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature archdetect rpi #223
Conversation
checks failed due to HTTP rate limit, not code error... |
…oss/2023a {2023.06}[foss/2023a] dask v2023.9.2
Make check_missing_installations.sh check against develop branch of EasyBuild
…t GPU support for 2023b
…op back to regular user and do installations
{2023.06}[gompi/2023a,gompi/2023b] OSU Microbenchmarks v 7.1.1, OSU Microbenchmarks v 7.2 w/ CUDA 12.1.1
…t we specify in our RC file, see search order on https://lmod.readthedocs.io/en/latest/145_properties.html?highlight=lmod_rc#the-properties-file-lmodrc-lua . Also, prefix our hooks with eessi_ to avoid unintentional clashes in namespace between site lmod configuration and eessi lmod configuration
…a hook. Lmod only permits the registration of a single function, trying to register a second function will just overwrite the first, as can be seen from https://github.com/TACC/Lmod/blob/a97d68193a6f32ebca4b4bd70dac0f6ac8fddefe/src/Hook.lua#L87
…N-2023.12-foss-2023a
Co-authored-by: Kenneth Hoste <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kenneth Hoste <[email protected]>
Fix Highway hook: change optarch in `pre_prepare_hook` and reset it in `post_prepare_hook`
…N-2023.12-foss-2023a
{2023.06}[2023a] Modflow 6.4.4 and deps
…N-2023.12-foss-2023a
….12-foss-2023a {2023.06}[foss/2023a] R-bundle-CRAN 2023.12
{2023.06}[system] EasyBuild v4.9.1
|
@hmeiland You are targeting the wrong branch with this, it should be 2023.06-software.eessi.io |
@hmeiland Unfortunately, this is not working as intended, See https://github.com/EESSI/software-layer/actions/runs/8660373452/job/23748193970?pr=223 , correct output should be |
Are we not just better off adding additional required features to https://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2022/11/08/from-a-diary-of-aarch64-porter-arm-cpu-features-table/ could help here |
Alternative to this is merged in #540 where I've ensured that an instruction from the 8.2 instruction set is used to decide on the arch (rather than |
add raspberry pi support by adding feature to use CPU part for aarch64