-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes for JOSS reviewing process #100
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
First, a quality-of-life improvement with adding an issue template. |
That seems good to me. I suppose we could add the original S-L description in the 1999 paper, but the recent other paper(s) are more complete and refer to the 1999 paper, and that paper doesn't describe EXP per se. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we want:
find_package(Eigen3 3.4...<3.5 REQUIRED)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we need to explain make -j 4
? E.g. "The -j 4
flag allows up to 4
processes to compile simulateously. Change 4
to the number of cores you can allot to compiling."
There are several adjustments and improvements to make as part of the JOSS review process; this branch will handle them in one place.