Quality: Parameterize SDK and test-data branches in CI workflow

[typotter]

🎟️ Fixes FF-3141
🎟️ Fixes FF-3095
towards FF-3085

👯‍♂️ Related PRs

• sdk-test-data#81

Motivation

Changes are often made to the sdk-test-data repository to capture new behaviours, bugs and edge cases. When these changes are pushed to main, the SDKs are cloned locally (locally to the github action running) and their respective tests are run. These tests are set up and run by copies of the SDK test workflows - see sdk-test-data workflow. There are a number of limitations to this setup:

• Test steps are copied from the SDK’s respective workflows; changes to the SDK test workflows need to be replicated in sdk-test-data and this is not obvious to devs
• The SDK tests are not able to run against in-flight changes to sdk-test-data
• When new test-data is committed that breaks an SDK, that breakage is not surfaced in the SDK’s repository until some action triggers its testing workflow (on demand, on pull-request, etc.).

Description of Changes

This change
🚀 - the CI workflow is enhanced into a reusable workflow, exposing parameters for SDK branch and the sdk-test-data branch to use in testing.

• The test workflow runs using the main branch of sdk-test-data on all main pushes and Pull Requests using the PR's branch

External to this Change
sdk-test-data get two testing workflows.

1. ♻️ "Local Testing"- For all pull request changes, the "Local Testing" workflow calls the reusable SDK workflows, test results are recorded only in the sdk-test-data repository. This is run using the main SDK branch and the "current" branch of workflow, i.e. the pull request branch. (SDK repo does not see/is not notified of test failures during PR lifecycle, only on push to main)
2. ♻️ 🧑‍💻 "Remote Testing" - On all pushes to the main branch of sdk-test-data, the SDK testing workflows are triggered to run within their respective repositories, alerting all subscribers of failed runs (repo is red/green).

[leoromanovsky]

There are some test failures related to file paths. Can I help here?

[typotter]

There are some test failures related to file paths. Can I help here?

Thanks. I dropped cloning the test data for python and ruby since they didn't have universal tests but I missed that they're got a couple static tests using the data files.

[leoromanovsky]

python will get fixed in #77

comments addressed