#2421 feat: added ability to message recipient without valid public key

[ioanmo226]

This PR added ability to message recipient without valid public key

close #2421 // if this PR closes an issue

Screen.Recording.2023-11-08.at.10.00.26.AM.mov

---

Tests (delete all except exactly one):

• Tests added or updated

---

To be filled by reviewers

I have reviewed that this PR... (tick whichever items you personally focused on during this review):

• addresses the issue it closes (if any)
• code is readable and understandable
• is accompanied with tests, or tests are not needed
• is free of vulnerabilities
• is documented clearly and usefully, or doesn't need documentation

[ioanmo226]

@sosnovsky I implemented like above one.
I think this one might be sufficient? (Allow user to send encrypted/password-protected message/cancel).
Prefixing text(like Hi, i tried to send you encrypted message...) is also a good idea (need to add extra logic though) but I think above implementation might be sufficient.
Let me know your thought.

[sosnovsky]

@sosnovsky I implemented like above one. I think this one might be sufficient? (Allow user to send encrypted/password-protected message/cancel). Prefixing text(like Hi, i tried to send you encrypted message...) is also a good idea (need to add extra logic though) but I think above implementation might be sufficient. Let me know your thought.

Yes, such implementation is simpler and good enough, allowing users to send messages for recipients even with invalid key.

I just noticed that Web portal password added section isn't visible when sending password message to recipient with invalid key:

[ioanmo226]

@sosnovsky Ready for review. Please check

[sosnovsky]

Works well, just need to add back restriction for enterprise builds

[sosnovsky]

Works great now, thanks!