Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct email configuration field name #3336

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wied03
Copy link
Contributor

@wied03 wied03 commented Oct 16, 2024

Everything else in emailConfiguration appears to be correct.

The reason the check api test did not pick this up is it's correct in the sample requests/responses, but not the actual <APIField>.

Everything else in `emailConfiguration` appears to be correct
@wied03 wied03 requested review from a team as code owners October 16, 2024 19:20
Copy link
Contributor

@lyleschemmerling lyleschemmerling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't right. That is the correct field name on Application.

did someone report this as an issue?

@wied03
Copy link
Contributor Author

wied03 commented Oct 16, 2024

This isn't right. That is the correct field name on Application.

did someone report this as an issue?

2 different classes. The field in ApplicationEmailConfiguration is not the same as EmailConfiguration, used by the tenant.

@lyleschemmerling
Copy link
Contributor

Correct. That component works for both cases. Odds are it is not getting passed the "is_tenant" prop on the tenant side

@wied03 wied03 merged commit d868e7c into main Oct 16, 2024
3 checks passed
@wied03 wied03 deleted the wied03/tenant_api_correction branch October 16, 2024 22:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants