Allow a Query to Set the Edit Options #989
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
simon-leech
added
the
Feature
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a simple change, in PR #930 we added the ability to use an empty
edit.optionsarray that would then run thedistinct_valuestemplate on the database.This PR simply allows the configuration developer to optionally provide an
entry.edit.querythat will instead be used to populate theentry.edit.options.This is required as is it possible the options come from a different column / different table entirely, especially if a table is initially empty no options will be provided.