Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency pylint to v3.0.3 #710

Merged

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pylint (changelog) ==3.0.0 -> ==3.0.3 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

pylint-dev/pylint (pylint)

v3.0.3

Compare Source

What's new in Pylint 3.0.3?

Release date: 2023-12-11

False Positives Fixed

  • Fixed false positive for unnecessary-lambda when the call has keyword arguments but not the lambda.

    Closes #​9148

  • Fixed incorrect suggestion for shallow copy in unnecessary-comprehension

    Example of the suggestion:
    #pylint: disable=missing-module-docstring
    a = [1, 2, 3]
    b = [x for x in a]
    b[0] = 0
    print(a) # [1, 2, 3]

    After changing b = [x for x in a] to b = a based on the suggestion, the script now prints [0, 2, 3]. The correct suggestion should be use list(a) to preserve the original behavior.

    Closes #​9172

  • Fix false positives for undefined-variable and unused-argument for
    classes and functions using Python 3.12 generic type syntax.

    Closes #​9193

  • Fixed pointless-string-statement false positive for docstrings
    on Python 3.12 type aliases.

    Closes #​9268

  • Fix false positive for invalid-exception-operation when concatenating tuples
    of exception types.

    Closes #​9288

Other Bug Fixes

  • Fix a bug where pylint was unable to walk recursively through a directory if the
    directory has an __init__.py file.

    Closes #​9210

v3.0.2

Compare Source

False Positives Fixed

  • Fix used-before-assignment false positive for generic type syntax (PEP 695, Python 3.12).

    Closes #​9110

Other Bug Fixes

  • Escape special symbols and newlines in messages.

    Closes #​7874

  • Fixes suggestion for nested-min-max for expressions with additive operators, list and dict comprehensions.

    Closes #​8524

  • Fixes ignoring conditional imports with ignore-imports=y.

    Closes #​8914

  • Emit inconsistent-quotes for f-strings with 3.12 interpreter only if targeting pre-3.12 versions.

    Closes #​9113

v3.0.1

False Positives Fixed

  • Fixed false positive for inherit-non-class for generic Protocols.

    Closes #​9106

Other Changes

  • Fix a crash when an enum class which is also decorated with a dataclasses.dataclass decorator is defined.

    Closes #​9100


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every 3 months on the first day of the month" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@forking-renovate forking-renovate bot added the automerge Summon MOG for automerging label Jan 1, 2024
@renovate-bot renovate-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 1, 2024 04:03
Copy link

Merge-on-green attempted to merge your PR for 6 hours, but it was not mergeable because either one of your required status checks failed, one of your required reviews was not approved, or there is a do not merge label. Learn more about your required status checks here: https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-status-checks. You can remove and reapply the label to re-run the bot.

@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Summon MOG for automerging label Jan 1, 2024
@holtskinner holtskinner merged commit 3cefdbc into GoogleCloudPlatform:main Jan 2, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants