Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

workflows/triage: scope permissions more tightly #192232

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

carlocab
Copy link
Member

Let's be a bit more careful about permissions in this workflow by
scoping permissions to each job.

While we're here, let's make the limit-pull-requests comment a bit
more readable.

Let's be a bit more careful about permissions in this workflow by
scoping permissions to each job.

While we're here, let's make the `limit-pull-requests` comment a bit
more readable.
@carlocab carlocab requested a review from a team as a code owner September 28, 2024 20:05
@carlocab carlocab added the CI-syntax-only Change only affects brew syntax, not the install. Only run syntax CI. label Sep 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added workflows PR modifies GitHub Actions workflow files automerge-skip `brew pr-automerge` will skip this pull request labels Sep 28, 2024
Copy link
Member

@MikeMcQuaid MikeMcQuaid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, thanks!

@carlocab carlocab added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit a43c7c5 Sep 30, 2024
20 checks passed
@carlocab carlocab deleted the triage-permissions branch September 30, 2024 23:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge-skip `brew pr-automerge` will skip this pull request CI-syntax-only Change only affects brew syntax, not the install. Only run syntax CI. workflows PR modifies GitHub Actions workflow files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants