feat: Change Iterator base on google guideline

[NguyenHoangSon96]

Closes #

Proposed Changes

_ Rewrite QueryIterator base on google guidelines
Link issue: Issue
Guidelines suggested Guidelines

Checklist

• CHANGELOG.md updated
• Rebased/mergeable
• A test has been added if appropriate
• Tests pass
• Commit messages are conventional
• Sign CLA (if not already signed)

[NguyenHoangSon96]

@bednar @vlastahajek
Some code blocks reported by codecov has been ignored because I don't think it is necessary to test them, most of them just copied from the old code...
Please tell me if you think otherwise

Should we deprecate the QueryIterator? 🤔

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 53.62319% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.41%. Comparing base (53e02a2) to head (db475aa).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
influxdb3/point_value_iterator.go	57.69%	16 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
influxdb3/query.go	41.17%	10 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #131      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.11%   86.41%   -1.71%     
==========================================
  Files          15       16       +1     
  Lines        1346     1413      +67     
==========================================
+ Hits         1186     1221      +35     
- Misses        134      160      +26     
- Partials       26       32       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[alespour]

Nice! LGTM

[vlastahajek]

This method is almost the same as in query_iterator.go. Please, refactor it so there is only one such logic.

[vlastahajek]

flight.Reader.Next() can produce an error and return false.
We should check for the error and act accordingly.