Triage top_k test failure from radix-sort-based implementation

[ndgrigorian]

This PR is meant to triage a failure in top_k that can only be reproduced in public CI.

• Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
• Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
• Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
• Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
• Have you checked performance impact of proposed changes?
• Have you added documentation for your changes, if necessary?
• Have you added your changes to the changelog?
• If this PR is a work in progress, are you opening the PR as a draft?

[github-actions]

Deleted rendered PR docs from intelpython.github.com/dpctl, latest should be updated shortly. 🤞

[github-actions]

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.19.0dev0=py310h93fe807_335 ran successfully.
Passed: 894
Failed: 2
Skipped: 118

[github-actions]

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.19.0dev0=py310h93fe807_336 ran successfully.
Passed: 895
Failed: 1
Skipped: 118

[github-actions]

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.19.0dev0=py310h93fe807_337 ran successfully.
Passed: 894
Failed: 2
Skipped: 118

[oleksandr-pavlyk]

Closing, since changes from this PR were merged in gh-1946