Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to Django v3 #102

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Upgrade to Django v3 #102

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

CasEbb
Copy link
Contributor

@CasEbb CasEbb commented Jul 26, 2022

2.2 LTS isn't supported anymore

Fixes #83

@WKobes
Copy link
Contributor

WKobes commented Jul 27, 2022

Fixes #83

Copy link
Contributor

@WKobes WKobes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good overall, will test this soon

eventlog==0.11.0
icalendar==4.0.7
jsonfield<3.1.0
Django==3.2.14
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3.3 and maybe >3.0?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Technically, you need to pin your dependencies in requirements.txt to an exact version to avoid inconsistency between development and production. Maybe it's an idea to use Poetry to make dependency management less painful.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, although the subversions of Django are always compatible and only bring bug and security fixes. As we receive an email notification for every update, we update all environments in time. Poetry looks interesting, although if we go for that, we probably would want to implement that for all repos at the same time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update to Django 3.2 LTS
2 participants