Adding Alex benchmarks (Issue #229)

[AlbertoBittes]

Description

Inclusion of UKAEA benchmarks as per Issue #229. Code has been modified and tests updated. MCNP inputs/WWs and Experimental data will be managed separately.

Fixes #229

Type of change

Please select what type of change this is.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New benchmark
  • Non-breaking change which entirely uses exisiting classes, structure etc
  • Breaking change which has implemented new/modified classes etc
• New feature
  • Non-breaking change which adds functionality
  • Breaking change fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected

Other changes

• This change requires a documentation update
• (If Benchmark) This requires additional data that can be obtained from:
  • Benchmark data 1
  • Benchamrk data 2

Testing

test_fnghcpboutput() was added to expoutput.py test file.

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• General testing
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Coverage is >80%

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.62745% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
jade/expoutput.py	95.89%	8 Missing ⚠️
jade/postprocess.py	37.50%	5 Missing ⚠️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
jade/computational.py	71.23% <ø> (ø)
jade/plotter.py	96.05% <100.00%> (ø)
jade/status.py	87.82% <ø> (ø)
jade/postprocess.py	36.47% <37.50%> (-1.51%)	⬇️
jade/expoutput.py	93.48% <95.89%> (+1.33%)	⬆️

[alexvalentine94]

NOTE. bmark_addtion_1 can be removed following merge.

[alexvalentine94]

Thanks for picking up @AlbertoBittes !