Follow-up 2 to #1363 (update from spack dev 20241031): fix JEDI CI container builds for gcc and clang, and work towards fixing intel

[climbfuji]

Summary

This PR is a follow up to the update from spack develop in #1363. It removes the external gmake packages so that the new requirement for gmake to be one of 4.2.1 or 4.4.1 can be honored.

Testing

• ubuntu-clang-mpich with jedi-ci specs: https://github.com/JCSDA/spack-stack/actions/runs/11836736765/job/32982264182
• ubuntu-gcc-openmpi with jedi-ci specs: https://github.com/JCSDA/spack-stack/actions/runs/11849699792/job/33023385023
• ubuntu-intel-impi with jedi-ci specs: https://github.com/JCSDA/spack-stack/actions/runs/11856641403/job/33043320658 - Failed with an unrelated error that JCSDA needs to fix (also a result of the update from spack develop as of 2024/10/31:

#18 ERROR: process "docker-shell cd /opt/spack-environment && spack env activate . && spack install --fail-fast && spack gc -y" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1
------
 > [builder 6/8] RUN cd /opt/spack-environment && spack env activate . && spack install --fail-fast && spack gc -y:
33.03 ==> Error: failed to concretize `[email protected]`, `[email protected]`, `[email protected]`, `[email protected]`, ..., `[email protected]` for the following reasons:
33.03      1. rust: Rust not compatible with Intel Classic compilers
33.03      2. rust: Rust not compatible with Intel Classic compilers
33.03         required because conflict is triggered when %intel 
33.03         required because conflict constraint  . You could consider setting `concretizer:unify` to `when_possible` or `false` to allow multiple versions of some packages.

Applications affected

JEDI CI

Systems affected

JEDI CI containers

Dependencies

n/a

Issue(s) addressed

n/a

Checklist

• This PR addresses one issue/problem/enhancement, or has a very good reason for not doing so.
• These changes have been tested on the affected systems and applications.
• All dependency PRs/issues have been resolved and this PR can be merged.

[eap]

Looks good, thanks for the fix.

[climbfuji]

Thanks for the quick review!

[climbfuji]

Created a follow-up issue for the remaining Intel error: #1383

[stiggy87]

Looks good to me!