Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed the issue of conversation restart not working properly. #472

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

AbhijeetRanjan308
Copy link
Contributor

@AbhijeetRanjan308 AbhijeetRanjan308 commented Jan 28, 2025

Summary

  • The condition failed because the Zendesk check enforced case sensitivity while validating the Zendesk key, which either enables the creation of a new Zendesk-enabled conversation or exits if the key is absent.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved conversation handling logic to validate Zendesk account key more consistently across different SDK configurations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the setupConversationClosedView method in the KMConversationViewController class. The key change involves moving the zendeskAcckountKey validation check outside of a preprocessor directive, which means the check will now be performed regardless of whether the ChatProvidersSDK is imported. This adjustment broadens the accessibility of the conversation creation logic, allowing for potential new conversation creation even without the SDK, provided the Zendesk account key is valid.

Changes

File Change Summary
Sources/Kommunicate/Classes/KMConversationViewController.swift Moved zendeskAcckountKey validation outside #if canImport(ChatProvidersSDK) directive, ensuring consistent check across SDK availability

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • adarshmishra

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so bright,
Where Zendesk keys now shine with might
Outside the SDK's narrow gate
Conversations now won't hesitate
To bloom and grow with newfound light! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@AbhijeetRanjan308
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9657c2b and 0e5989d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Sources/Kommunicate/Classes/KMConversationViewController.swift (1 hunks)

Comment on lines 575 to 576
guard let zendeskAcckountKey = ALApplozicSettings.getZendeskSdkAccountKey(),
!zendeskAcckountKey.isEmpty else { return }
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Jan 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Fix the typo in variable name zendeskAcckountKey

The variable name has a spelling inconsistency across the codebase:

  • zendeskAcckountKey in KMConversationViewController.swift (with three 'c's)
  • zendeskAccountKey in KMConversationService.swift (correct spelling)

Please update the spelling to match the service layer implementation:

-            guard let zendeskAcckountKey = ALApplozicSettings.getZendeskSdkAccountKey(),
-                  !zendeskAcckountKey.isEmpty else { return }
+            guard let zendeskAccountKey = ALApplozicSettings.getZendeskSdkAccountKey(),
+                  !zendeskAccountKey.isEmpty else { return }

             #if canImport(ChatProvidersSDK)
-                zendeskHandler.initiateZendesk(key: zendeskAcckountKey)
+                zendeskHandler.initiateZendesk(key: zendeskAccountKey)
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Consider using isEmpty directly.

The validation check for the Zendesk account key has been correctly moved outside the preprocessor directive, which fixes the conversation restart issue. However, the validation can be simplified.

Consider this minor improvement:

-            guard let zendeskAcckountKey = ALApplozicSettings.getZendeskSdkAccountKey(),
-                  !zendeskAcckountKey.isEmpty else { return }
+            guard let zendeskAcckountKey = ALApplozicSettings.getZendeskSdkAccountKey(),
+                  !zendeskAcckountKey.isEmpty else { return }

Note: There's also a typo in the variable name (zendeskAcckountKey should be zendeskAccountKey), but since this might be used consistently across the codebase, I'll verify it first.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all occurrences of the potentially misspelled variable name
rg "zendeskAcckountKey|zendeskAccountKey" -A 2

Length of output: 1421

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AbhijeetRanjan308 I notice there's still one remaining instance of the typo zendeskAcckountKey in the file. Could you please update this line as well:

zendeskHandler.initiateZendesk(key: zendeskAcckountKey)

to:

zendeskHandler.initiateZendesk(key: zendeskAccountKey)

This will ensure consistent naming throughout the codebase.

🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the typo still exists in the file
rg "zendeskAcckountKey" "Sources/Kommunicate/Classes/KMConversationViewController.swift"

Length of output: 158

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AbhijeetRanjan308 Perfect! I've verified that the variable name has been corrected throughout the file. Thank you for making these changes.

🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if any instances of the typo still exist
rg "zendeskAcckountKey" "Sources/Kommunicate/Classes/KMConversationViewController.swift"

Length of output: 86


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the correct spelling is now being used
rg "zendeskAccountKey" "Sources/Kommunicate/Classes/KMConversationViewController.swift"

Length of output: 305


If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!

@AbhijeetRanjan308
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed in Automation PR: #474
Also Added Automation test case to verify the Restart.

@AbhijeetRanjan308 AbhijeetRanjan308 deleted the restartConversation_fix branch January 30, 2025 07:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants