Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better IguanaTV #433

Closed

Conversation

TheComputerGenie
Copy link
Contributor

A take off #424 that adds color, begins to order prints in a consistent manner, and removes some duplicate prints (both in number and content).

ca333 and others added 4 commits July 27, 2022 07:53
Colorize chain symbols
Cut some message bits (to remove non-meaningful duplicates)
Reword some things for meaning
Reorder some messages for consistency
A little less screen clutter
@smk762 smk762 changed the base branch from master to dev October 14, 2022 10:28
iguana/dpow/dpow_fsm.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Kadan Stadelmann <[email protected]>
@gcharang gcharang requested a review from smk762 May 27, 2023 03:38
smk762
smk762 previously approved these changes May 27, 2023
ca333
ca333 previously approved these changes May 29, 2023
Alrighttt
Alrighttt previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Alrighttt Alrighttt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

crypto777/m_LP Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crypto777/m_LP Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Alrighttt Alrighttt dismissed stale reviews from ca333, smk762, and themself via 847a132 July 14, 2023 12:47
@DeckerSU
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your contribution. The idea to colorize iguana output is an interesting one and I appreciate your creativity. However, I believe that introducing colors may not be beneficial for every user. Preferences on color schemes vary significantly and in some cases, it can be even distracting.

Although your PR doesn't introduce any negative changes, it also doesn't provide a universally agreed upon enhancement to our repository. Hence, I propose closing this PR for now. If the wider community demonstrates significant interest and we receive, say, 20 likes or more from the notary node operators, we can certainly revisit this discussion.

Thank you again for your effort, and I encourage you to continue contributing to our code base.

@DeckerSU DeckerSU closed this Jul 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants