Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change ProGuard rules to suppress the library causing the problem #394

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 4 additions & 8 deletions core/jvm/resources/META-INF/proguard/datetime.pro
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
# We depend on kotlinx-serialization as compileOnly.
# If the serializers don't get used, the library works properly even without the
# kotlinx-serialization dependency, but Proguard emits warnings about datetime
# classes mentioning some serialization-related entities.
# These rules should not cause problems: if a project actually relies on
# serialization, then much more than just these two classes will be required,
# so telling Proguard not to worry if these two are missing will not prevent it
# from emitting errors for code that does use serialization but somehow forgot
# to depend on it.
-dontwarn kotlinx.serialization.KSerializer
-dontwarn kotlinx.serialization.Serializable
# classes mentioning some serialization-related entities, for example:
# Missing class kotlinx.serialization.KSerializer (referenced from: kotlinx.datetime.serializers.InstantIso8601Serializer)
# Missing class kotlinx.serialization.Serializable (referenced from: kotlinx.datetime.Instant)
-dontwarn kotlinx.datetime.**