-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CodeQL analysis #31
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
CodeQL analysis #31
Conversation
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Checks do not pass as CodeQL found defects. PR can be merged, defects can be solved after merge. |
branches: [ "master", "develop" ] | ||
pull_request: | ||
# The branches below must be a subset of the branches above | ||
branches: [ "master", "develop" ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like CodeQL could run on any PR, not only master
or develop
-backed ones.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR are made more or less exclusively on these branches, but as you prefer.
Also, see the comment: "The branches below must be a subset of the branches above".
Feel free to modify this behavior, I don't have a strong opinion on that.
No description provided.