forked from Maps4HTML/MapML-Proposal
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Add substance to usability/accessibility statement
Address the following feedback in Maps4HTML#17: > > The complexity of choices and the wide variety of technologies required to create Web maps results in maps of highly variable usability and accessibility. > > I don't really follow this. Usability and accessibility are used but without substance.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
1 addition
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
edf64d6
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's really great that my bald unsupported statement has turned out to in fact be true, thanks to your analysis. The upcoming workshop will provide more documentation of this, I think, and not only coming from you and Nic.
In thinking about the subsequent statement: "This has in turn led to the creation of centralized mapping services"... it occurs to me that what I was thinking when I wrote that was that OGC standardization, despite decades of effort, has had little/less effect on the rise of centralized mapping than what I believe we might have been aiming for. By providing a Web standard for maps and layers, we might not avoid centralized services altogether, but we might create a healthier ecosystem by lowering the barriers to map creation and use (because performance of non-centralized services would be better). I wrote this document early in the year when Alex Russell was basically saying the mobile Web is dead or non-existent, and that was the windmill I was tilting at then. However, the document is already too long (according to Simon IIRC, which I accept the truth of) so it's probably better left to blogging / bloggers to talk about.