RFC introspector system integration

RFCs/rfc-0010-meta-introspector.md

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+# RFC-0010: Mina Protocol Introspection and Verification Framework
+
+- **Intent**: To propose the development of a comprehensive introspection and verification framework for the Mina Protocol, enhancing its security, reliability, and overall quality.
+- **Submitted by**: [Your Name], meta-introspector project lead (contact: [your email], Discord: [your handle])
+- **Submitted on**: [Insert Current Date]
+
+## Abstract
+
+This RFC proposes the creation of a robust introspection and verification framework for the Mina Protocol. The framework aims to enhance the security, reliability, and code quality of the Mina ecosystem through formal verification, bug bounties, and continuous monitoring.
+
+## Introduction
+
+As a zero-knowledge proof-based blockchain, the Mina Protocol requires stringent security measures and formal verification to ensure its integrity and reliability. This RFC addresses the need for advanced introspection and verification tools within the Mina ecosystem, proposing a comprehensive framework that combines formal verification, bug bounties, and continuous monitoring.
+
+## Objectives
+
+1. Develop a Coq-based formal verification framework tailored to the Mina Protocol.
+2. Implement a bug bounty program to incentivize security researchers and improve overall protocol security.
+3. Create an introspector service integrated with the Mina ecosystem for continuous verification and code quality monitoring.
+4. Establish a funding mechanism to support ongoing development and maintenance of the framework.
+
+## Motivation and Rationale
+
+The Mina Protocol's unique architecture and use of zero-knowledge proofs present specific challenges in terms of verification and security. Current blockchain security practices may not fully address these challenges. By implementing a tailored introspection and verification framework, we can:
+
+1. Increase confidence in the Mina Protocol's security and reliability.
+2. Attract more developers and users to the Mina ecosystem by demonstrating a commitment to robust security practices.
+3. Potentially identify and resolve critical issues before they impact the network.
+4. Create a model for other blockchain projects to follow in terms of comprehensive security and verification practices.
+
+## Scenarios and Use Cases
+
+### Scenario 1: Formal Verification of Protocol Updates
+
+| Aspect           | Description |
+|------------------|-------------|
+| **Description**  | When a new update to the Mina Protocol is proposed, it needs to be formally verified before implementation. |
+| **Requirements** | The Coq-based verification framework must be able to model and verify the proposed changes against the existing protocol specification. |
+| **Expected Outcome** | The framework provides a mathematical proof of the update's correctness or identifies potential issues. |
+| **Impact Analysis** | This process will significantly reduce the risk of introducing bugs or vulnerabilities through protocol updates, enhancing overall network stability and security. |
+
+### Scenario 2: Continuous Monitoring of Network Behavior
+
+| Aspect           | Description |
+|------------------|-------------|
+| **Description**  | The introspector service continuously monitors the Mina network for any anomalies or unexpected behaviors. |
+| **Requirements** | The service must be able to analyze network data in real-time and compare it against expected behaviors defined in the formal specification. |
+| **Expected Outcome** | Any deviations from expected behavior are quickly identified and flagged for further investigation. |
+| **Impact Analysis** | This will allow for rapid response to potential issues, minimizing the impact of any vulnerabilities or attacks on the network. |
+
+### Scenario 3: Bug Bounty Program
+
+| Aspect           | Description |
+|------------------|-------------|
+| **Description**  | Security researchers and developers can submit potential vulnerabilities or bugs they discover in the Mina Protocol. |
+| **Requirements** | A clear submission process, a defined scope of what constitutes a valid submission, and a transparent reward structure. |
+| **Expected Outcome** | Regular identification and resolution of potential security issues, with appropriate rewards distributed to contributors. |
+| **Impact Analysis** | This will create a collaborative security ecosystem, leveraging the broader community to enhance the protocol's security. |
+
+## Open Issues and Discussion Points
+
+1. What specific areas of the Mina Protocol should be prioritized for formal verification?
+2. How can we ensure that the formal verification process is accessible and understandable to a broader range of developers and auditors?
+3. What metrics should be used to measure the success and impact of the bug bounty program?
+4. How can we balance the need for transparency in the verification process with the potential security risks of making all details public?
+5. What level of integration with existing Mina development tools and processes is necessary for optimal adoption of this framework?
+
+## Conclusion
+
+The proposed introspection and verification framework has the potential to significantly enhance the security, reliability, and overall quality of the Mina Protocol. By combining formal verification, continuous monitoring, and community-driven bug discovery, we can create a robust ecosystem that instills confidence in developers, users, and stakeholders. This initiative aligns with Mina's commitment to innovation and security in the blockchain space.
+
+## Appendices
+
+https://github.com/meta-introspector/time-grants
+
+This RFC provides a starting point for discussion and refinement of the proposed introspection and verification framework. Community feedback and further technical discussions will be crucial in shaping the final proposal and subsequent RFP.