-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Failure cases handling #80
Comments
hi pigmej, do we have some plan or proposal for this requirement? we want to use AppController for workflow tasks (k8s jobs), thanks. |
@nkwangleiGIT Currently @gluke77 is doing research about that, how we can support that etc. We will have document for that somewhere in the middle of this week. @nkwangleiGIT Could you describe your use case? It would be cool to include it in @gluke77 research around that area. |
Basically, we have an idea to let user decide what to do with failures, and provide him with several options. What we plan for first iteration of this feature is:
In the future we plan to support more sophisticated scenarios, when you can attach custom graphs on different failures. This would allow more elegant tear down or alternative graph execution. Anyway, it would be great to see your use cases @nkwangleiGIT , we could consider them in our design |
@pigmej @zen thanks so much for your reply.
We'd like to contribute this project once we get familiar with this great tool, it'll be also great if you can send me some more documents to get start besides the ones in this repository, thanks! |
@nkwangleiGIT Ptal #98. If you think that the document does not cover all your usecases, pls let me know. |
@gluke77 it's sufficient for our current requirement, when we can get the 1st version implementation about this? |
@nkwangleiGIT As for implementation ETA, well the only answer that I could give is "we want it rather sooner then later". As for externally available events -- we don't have any plans yet. |
@nkwangleiGIT or maybe you meant more or less some post deployment events ? And handling these errors? If yes then it's also being worked on currently. |
General handling landed, specific cases moved to next milestone. |
'Ignore this" implemented #205 |
Currently we support only success path, we may need to support failure path too.
Exact scope of this issue is TDB.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: