Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mapping fates parameters that are common with hlm parameters #11

Open
glemieux opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Mapping fates parameters that are common with hlm parameters #11

glemieux opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement Feature that improves the function of the guide outside of content

Comments

@glemieux
Copy link
Collaborator

glemieux commented May 23, 2022

During the May 23, 2022 fates software meeting we discussed NGEET/fates#311 as a group. The consensus seemed to agree that @rosiealice suggestion of developing a table was likely the best path forward for this issue:

Maybe another solution is just to have a table on the wiki or elsewhere which can give this information broadly to the user community who aren't as familiar with all of the history of these parameter fields.

The "elsewhere" here was suggested to be a page in this fates-users-guide likely the notable differences page. @adrifoster noted that she had started a similar table for the PPE work that she has been doing and that we could use that as a jumping off point.

@glemieux glemieux added the enhancement Feature that improves the function of the guide outside of content label May 23, 2022
@glemieux
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@adrifoster is the table you mentioned in the context of the above discussion available publicly? Could you point me to it or take a crack at addressing this issue?

@adrifoster
Copy link

I didn't get very far but here is my current version

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Feature that improves the function of the guide outside of content
Projects
Status: ❕Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants