-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Init bugs #1073
Init bugs #1073
Conversation
…ated triads and wave breaking for the implicit unstructured scheme.
Hi @aronroland, thanks for submitting this bugfix PR! Its sounds like you did testing with ERDC for this. Is there a reason though that the regtests haven't been run? This should be done so you can fill out the PR header with specifically what tests have changed answers so we already have that information when we do testing for the review. |
Dear Mathew, as I have no computational resources to carry out the regtest we will do that within the review, please give us some time to do so. |
Hi @aronroland, sure, can you clarify if you are asking for time to allow you guys to run the tests? |
yes, exactly this what i am asking for. |
Sure thing, then. There are a few PR's in front of yours, so that gives some time already before your's is up. If we get to your's and you would still like more time, no problem, we can review it once you're ready. Thank you @aronroland |
thank u, Matthew ... |
I'm watching this PR with interest as I am currently experiencing B4B reproducibility issues with some of the PDLIB regression tests after my refactoring of W3SRCE. I am hoping this PR might make them disappear! 🤞 |
Hi Chris,
There is a possibility … soon I can also look at your stuff more detailed, since I have a vital interest in your work.
Cheers
Aron
Von: Chris Bunney ***@***.***>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. September 2023 10:07
An: NOAA-EMC/WW3 ***@***.***>
Cc: Aron Roland ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Betreff: Re: [NOAA-EMC/WW3] Init bugs (PR #1073)
I'm watching this PR with interest as I am currently experiencing B4B reproducibility issues with some of the PDLIB regression tests after my refactoring of W3SRCE. I am hoping this PR might make them disappear! 🤞
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1073 (comment)> , or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB2S43QHH67N55UOV7SPQD3X2FSRLANCNFSM6AAAAAA4VK4MEI> .
You are receiving this because you were mentioned. <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AB2S43VCS5E5DUXE3EC7ATTX2FSRLA5CNFSM6AAAAAA4VK4MEKWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTTGLGIDI.gif> Message ID: ***@***.*** ***@***.***> >
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aronroland We can start reviewing once the testing results have been added. Thanks
@aronroland please sync this branch for merged pr #1070. |
@thesser1 @aronroland I know you guys are testing, note that this branch needs to be synced to be current. |
Closing on behalf of @thesser1 and @aronroland. |
Pull Request Summary
This solves issue #1071
Description
See #1071
Please also include the following information:
Dear reviewer, as described in #1071 bugs have been found for the case when certain source terms or all source terms are switched off within the implicit UG scheme. The bugs have been solved and tested within the cases provided by ERDC.
Mention any labels that should be added:
bug
Are answer changes expected from this PR? Please describe the changes and the reason why in addition to which of the following labels would apply:
Reg-tests may change where the described settings are used.
Issue(s) addressed
See #1071
Commit Message
Non initialized Arrays for TR0, DB0 or FLSOU = .false. and erroneous boundary handling of the source terms for the Neumann boundary condtion on unstructured grids (implicit scheme)
Check list
Testing
Regression tests, will be done within the PR review ...