added a fix to models/xti_attention_processor.py #5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ible with later versions of diffusers that depreciated models.cross_attention and attn.cross_attention_norm
|
Looks good. Would you like to also update the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Later versions of diffusers after 0.14.0 do not have models.cross_atttention. Instead they use the models.attention_processor.Attention class. Added compatibility with this new class. Similarly, later versions do not have an argument for cross_attention_norm. Added compatibility for this as well.
EDIT: cross_attention_norm on line 38 in the hasattr function should be a string
hasattr(attn, "cross_attention_norm")