Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

freetube: 0.18.0 -> 0.19.0 #250484

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2023
Merged

freetube: 0.18.0 -> 0.19.0 #250484

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2023

Conversation

LAURAilway
Copy link
Contributor

@LAURAilway LAURAilway commented Aug 21, 2023

Description of changes

freetube: 0.18.0 -> 0.19.0
https://github.com/FreeTubeApp/FreeTube/releases/tag/v0.19.0-beta

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@natsukium
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your contribution!

Would you please read CONTRIBUTING.md (especially https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-conventions) and rewrite your commit message?
Thanks.

@ofborg ofborg bot requested review from alyaeanyx and ryneeverett August 21, 2023 05:38
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 labels Aug 21, 2023
@LAURAilway LAURAilway changed the title Updated freetube derivation to version 0.19.0 freetube: 0.18.0 -> 0.19.0 Aug 21, 2023
@LAURAilway
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for your contribution!

Would you please read CONTRIBUTING.md (especially https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-conventions) and rewrite your commit message? Thanks.

Like this?

@natsukium
Copy link
Member

That's great.
Could you change the commit message as well?

@natsukium
Copy link
Member

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 250484 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • freetube

@LAURAilway
Copy link
Contributor Author

That's great. Could you change the commit message as well?

Is this what you meant? (Sorry, first commit and very tired)

@natsukium
Copy link
Member

Don't worry.

I think this page is helpful for you.
https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/committing-changes-to-your-project/creating-and-editing-commits/changing-a-commit-message

The commit message is what is shown here as Updated freetube derivation to version 0.19.0.
To change it to freetube: 0.18.0 -> 0.19.0, please execute git commit --amend on your local repository.

Copy link
Member

@natsukium natsukium left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@natsukium natsukium merged commit 2552d29 into NixOS:master Aug 21, 2023
8 checks passed
@NixOSInfra NixOSInfra added the 12. first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle! label Aug 23, 2023
@absidue
Copy link

absidue commented Aug 28, 2023

Hi I'm one of the people on the FreeTube team and 3 people (including the author of this pull request) have reported that your FreeTube package is broken, but don't have issues using our official releases: FreeTubeApp/FreeTube#3953.

I don't know much about NixOS and it's packaging, however looking at your FreeTube packaging file, it looks like you are extracting our AppImage that was built with/for Electron 22.3.18 but running it with your own much newer Electron version.

@absidue
Copy link

absidue commented Aug 28, 2023

The reason I suspect the Electron mismatch is the problem, is that the unofficial AUR package had issues in the past, that were caused by using a different version of Electron to upstream.

@ryneeverett
Copy link
Contributor

It would be easy enough to switch from electron to electron_22, but I can't reproduce the reported bugs on wayland+sway.

@LAURAilway
Copy link
Contributor Author

LAURAilway commented Aug 29, 2023

The reason I suspect the Electron mismatch is the problem, is that the unofficial AUR package had issues in the past, that were caused by using a different version of Electron to upstream.

Thanks for the suggestion, should be fixed by #252061
(and in case anyone was curious, the default electron version was updated to 26 at pretty much the same time the FreeTube update was merged, so during testing, the electron version was still compatible)

@natsukium
Copy link
Member

natsukium commented Aug 31, 2023

It works on my Weston (WSL) and hyprland regardless of the version of electron.
Does pinning electron to 22 actually fix the reported bug?

@LAURAilway
Copy link
Contributor Author

It works on my Weston (WSL) and hyprland regardless of the version of electron. Does pinning electron to 22 actually fix the reported bug?

It does fix it on my end, I don't have anyone else to test it tho

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 12. first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants