Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libredirect: fixes for new Darwin SDK #347012

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: reckenrode/darwin-sdk-refactor
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

reckenrode
Copy link
Contributor

libredirect links without a wrapper, so it needs to specify the libc location based on $SDROOT after #346043 is merged.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

The install name should be the full path. This matches x86_64-darwin.
The location of `libSystem.tbd` depends on the SDK, making it
effectively dynamic. It must be located relative to the `SDKROOT`
instead of to `clang.libc`.
@reckenrode reckenrode deleted the branch NixOS:reckenrode/darwin-sdk-refactor October 8, 2024 03:30
@reckenrode reckenrode closed this Oct 8, 2024
@reckenrode reckenrode reopened this Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant