Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python312Packages.pysatochip: fix build #352942

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

itepastra
Copy link
Member

@itepastra itepastra commented Nov 1, 2024

depends on #352828

ZHF: #352882

Fix the build of pysatochip by fetching from github instead of pypi since some needed files were not in the pypi version.
Also removed the substitutions since these got fixed in the package itself

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@itepastra itepastra marked this pull request as draft November 1, 2024 19:11
@itepastra itepastra mentioned this pull request Nov 1, 2024
13 tasks
@itepastra itepastra added the 0.kind: ZHF Fixes Fixes during the Zero Hydra Failures (ZHF) campaign label Nov 1, 2024
@ofborg ofborg bot requested review from oxalica and layus November 2, 2024 04:11
@ofborg ofborg bot added the 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package label Nov 2, 2024
@layus
Copy link
Member

layus commented Nov 5, 2024

@itepastra Any reason this is still a draft ? It seems to be working now.

@itepastra
Copy link
Member Author

itepastra commented Nov 6, 2024

I need to rebase it since pyscard was fixed in a different pr and haven't had the time (tests and getting distracted)

@itepastra itepastra marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 09:17
@itepastra itepastra removed the 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package label Nov 6, 2024
@itepastra itepastra changed the title pythonPackages.pysatochip: fix build python312Packages.pysatochip: fix build Nov 6, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jopejoe1 jopejoe1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 352942


x86_64-linux

❌ 2 packages failed to build:
  • electron-cash
  • electron-cash.dist
✅ 4 packages built:
  • python311Packages.pysatochip
  • python311Packages.pysatochip.dist
  • python312Packages.pysatochip
  • python312Packages.pysatochip.dist

@jopejoe1 jopejoe1 merged commit 90fcec9 into NixOS:master Nov 6, 2024
38 checks passed
@itepastra itepastra deleted the pysatochip branch November 6, 2024 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants