Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][MIG] maintenance_team_hierarchy: Migration to 16.0 #349

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Jul 17, 2023

Conversation

kaynnan
Copy link
Contributor

@kaynnan kaynnan commented Jul 7, 2023

etobella and others added 15 commits July 7, 2023 12:15
[UPD] Update maintenance_team_hierarchy.pot
[UPD] Update maintenance_team_hierarchy.pot

[UPD] README.rst

Update translation files

Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: maintenance-13.0/maintenance-13.0-maintenance_team_hierarchy
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/maintenance-13-0/maintenance-13-0-maintenance_team_hierarchy/
Currently translated at 100.0% (13 of 13 strings)

Translation: maintenance-13.0/maintenance-13.0-maintenance_team_hierarchy
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/maintenance-13-0/maintenance-13-0-maintenance_team_hierarchy/it/
[UPD] Update maintenance_team_hierarchy.pot

[UPD] README.rst
Currently translated at 100.0% (13 of 13 strings)

Translation: maintenance-15.0/maintenance-15.0-maintenance_team_hierarchy
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/maintenance-15-0/maintenance-15-0-maintenance_team_hierarchy/it/
Currently translated at 100.0% (13 of 13 strings)

Translation: maintenance-15.0/maintenance-15.0-maintenance_team_hierarchy
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/maintenance-15-0/maintenance-15-0-maintenance_team_hierarchy/it/
@kaynnan
Copy link
Contributor Author

kaynnan commented Jul 7, 2023

ping @dalonsod

@kaynnan kaynnan marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2023 16:35
Copy link
Contributor

@dalonsod dalonsod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only code review at this moment

maintenance_team_hierarchy/models/maintenance_team.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kaynnan kaynnan force-pushed the 16.0-mig-maintenance_team_hierarchy branch from ff21c6e to 2639d27 Compare July 7, 2023 16:57
Copy link
Contributor

@dalonsod dalonsod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@marcelsavegnago marcelsavegnago left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@kaynnan
Copy link
Contributor Author

kaynnan commented Jul 14, 2023

ping @etobella

Copy link
Member

@etobella etobella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
/ocabot migration maintenance_team_hierarchy
/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 16.0 milestone Jul 17, 2023
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-349-by-etobella-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at f9ccafc. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 41f0b53 into OCA:16.0 Jul 17, 2023
@kaynnan kaynnan deleted the 16.0-mig-maintenance_team_hierarchy branch July 17, 2023 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants