-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Preliminary command-line options parser #140
Conversation
d5188a0
to
af68ec4
Compare
af68ec4
to
3889a0a
Compare
@kswirydo, after rebasing to the latest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Largely nitpicks - this is in great shape
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Now I am running it to see how the CLO interface works in practice.
Okay, so I decided to try to break it:
(should throw error if solver is wrong)
There should be NO sketching method is solver is FGMRES. |
Also this (note there is no sketching method so it is set to default - but then the name is not displayed)
|
If the option parameter is unrecognized, the test should fall back to the default. It should not segfault. I agree, sketching should not be printed, if randomized method is not used. This is easy to fix though. |
I cannot reproduce this. I get this when I make the same call:
I pulled from the lates |
@kswirydo, I couldn't reproduce issues you reported. I will merge this but feel free to open an issue, if you still see these problems. |
Provides: